Five Key Things to Watch in Tesla's Earnings Report
Analysts expect adjusted earnings of $1.12 a share on revenue of $24 billion, according to estimates compiled by Bloomberg. There's been a decrease in analysts' consensus for both profit and revenue since Tesla disclosed delivery figures on Jan. 2.
January 25, 2023 at 05:00 PM
5 minute read
AutomotiveTesla Inc. investors badly bruised by last year's 65% rout are looking for clarity from Wednesday's earnings report on demand for its electric vehicles, how recent price cuts will impact profitability and how many cars the company plans to make in 2023.
It's been an eventful three months since Tesla last reported earnings and Elon Musk spoke with Wall Street analysts. The chief executive officer closed his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter Inc. in late October, then offloaded $3.58 billion of Tesla stock in mid-December. Early this month, Tesla reported fourth-quarter deliveries that fell well short of expectations, then slashed prices in the U.S. and Europe.
Analysts expect adjusted earnings of $1.12 a share on revenue of $24 billion, according to estimates compiled by Bloomberg. There's been a decrease in analysts' consensus for both profit and revenue since Tesla disclosed delivery figures on Jan. 2.
Tesla shares have retraced some of last year's losses, rising 17% this month, and the results might inject another dose of volatility. Options pricing suggests the stock may fluctuate 11% in either direction post-earnings, which would be the biggest such move since the fourth quarter of 2021, according to Bloomberg data.
Here are five key items to watch when Tesla reports fourth-quarter earnings after the market close.
Demand and Delivery Guidance
Tesla now has four auto plants on three continents and delivered 1.31 million cars worldwide in 2022. In its last shareholder deck, the company said its factories had the capacity to build more than 1.9 million vehicles annually.
Since the start of 2021, the company has said it expects to average 50% growth in deliveries annually over multiple years.
That outlook is now in doubt. During a Twitter Spaces conversation last month, Musk predicted a serious recession and warned consumers will cut back on big-ticket purchases. He called higher interest rates and lower demand a "double whammy," and said Tesla faced a choice: "Do you want to grow unit volume, in which case you have to adjust prices downward? Or do you want to grow at a lower rate, or steady?"
"My bias would be to say: Let's grow as fast as we can without putting the company at risk," he said. In that scenario, Tesla's CEO said profits would be "lower to negative" during the recession, on the condition that its cash position is sound. "I think that's still the right move, long-term," Musk said.
Tesla then slashed prices across its lineup this month. So how many cars does the company expect to deliver in 2023? Investors should soon get an idea.
Gross Margins
Tesla has long claimed among the highest gross margins in the auto industry, and the company has said it expects software-related profit to increase over time. That may have come into play last quarter, as Musk made the highly controversial system Tesla has marketed as Full Self-Driving more widely available for paying customers.
But the price cuts Tesla enacted in China in the fourth quarter had to have affected margin, the reductions early this month will impact profitability going forward. Analysts are still expecting gross margin of 25% for the fourth quarter.
Cybertruck
The angular, stainless-steel Cybertruck is the next vehicle in Tesla's lineup, and one that consumers have shown enormous interest in. In its shareholder deck for the last quarter, the company said that it had started tooling up for the model at its newest plant in Austin, Texas.
We haven't heard much about Cybertruck details since Musk first unveiled it in November 2019. The Tesla growth story hinges on the future—on products ranging from the Cybertruck to the Semi, and business lines including energy and insurance. Also key will be the next-generation vehicle platform that will underpin cheaper models. Details on that may have to wait until the investor day the company has scheduled for March 1.
Capex
How much money does Tesla plan to spend to ramp up and expand existing factories, and potentially build new ones?
A year ago, Musk said that Tesla would spend 2022 looking at factory locations and possibly announce them before year-end. While the company didn't end up following through, Bloomberg reported in recent weeks that it's been finalizing plans for plants in Mexico and Indonesia.
On Tuesday, Tesla confirmed plans to invest $3.6 billion in Nevada to expand its facilities there to make enough batteries for 2 million cars a year, as well as Semi trucks. All these projects could mean the company ends up increasing capex from the $6 billion to $8 billion a year it's been forecasting since July.
4680 Progress
During Tesla's Battery Day event in September 2020, Tesla announced it was making new, larger 4680 battery cells on a pilot line at its Kato Road facility in Fremont, California. These are among the batteries that will be churned out in Nevada.
Making automotive-grade battery cells at consistently high volume and quality is no small feat, and Tesla's foray into battery cell production is another sign of how critical vertical integration is to its overall strategy.
Investors have repeatedly pressed Tesla executives on how many 4680 cells it's been making on a weekly or monthly basis. Also of interest: whether the cells are now going into Texas-made Model Ys that are being delivered to customers, or if the company continues to use them largely in cars driven by employees.
—With assistance from Sean O'Kane.
Dana Hull and Esha Dey report for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecurities Claims Against Lilium N.V. for Electric Plane Production Delays Fail to Take Flight, Federal Judge Holds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250