Oatly Group Launches Climate Footprint Labels in the US
Swedish company Oatly, which went public in May 2021, began putting similar climate labels on its vegan products sold in Europe in 2021.
January 31, 2023 at 02:43 PM
4 minute read
Financial Services and BankingOatly Group AB will this month debut climate footprint labels on four of its plant-based yogurts, known as Oatgurts, in the U.S., and plans to update the labeling on 12 additional products sold nationwide over the next two years. Climate details for these 16 Oatly products will also be available online.
"We're in the business of driving an impact to the food system through converting consumers from dairy products to their Oatly equivalents," says Julie Kunen, Oatly's sustainability director for North America. "We do this by trying to make them as delicious as possible. We also want people to be aware that those are sustainable choices."
The food system is responsible for roughly a third of human-made greenhouse gas emissions globally, and raising and feeding livestock is the largest contributor to that carbon footprint. Beef is the single most climate-intensive food, followed by other meats. Dairy products can also have relatively high footprints compared to plant-based foods.
In the U.S. market, plant-based dairy has a clear foothold. There were $2.4 billion worth of plant-based milk sales in U.S. retail stores over the 52 weeks ending on Jan. 1, compared with $15.7 billion in U.S. dairy milk sales, according to tracking from data firm IRI. Within plant-based milk, oat milk was the fastest-growing segment: IRI data shows oat milk sales hit $521 million during the same 52-week period, with dollar sales up 34% year over year.
To determine its products' climate footprint, Oatly starts by calculating the greenhouse gas emissions of its foods using what's called a life cycle assessment, meaning it captures the carbon dioxide and other emissions from "grower to grocer," according to Kunen. The total includes emissions from production of agricultural inputs, the impact of transport, manufacturing, processing, packaging and distribution, but does not include customer use and disposal. To do these calculations and verify the results, Oatly relies on climate-modeling software company CarbonCloud.
All of this information is then distilled into a single number, presented as kilogram of carbon dioxide equivalent per kilogram of packaged goods (kg CO2e/kg). Labeled "climate footprint," that number will be displayed prominently on the front of Oatly products. On the back, listed below the nutritional facts, the company discloses the date the climate analysis was done, mentions CarbonCloud is the source and includes a website url (oatly.com/footprint) where customers can find more information.
According to Oatly and CarbonCloud's calculations, the climate footprints of 16 of its U.S. products range from 0.62 to 1.9 kg CO2e/kg. (The company hopes to include climate footprint for the rest of its U.S. products in the future.) Separate estimates from the UK nonprofit Our World in Data show that the greenhouse-gas footprint of a liter of dairy milk is 3.15 kilograms, compared with 0.9 kilograms for a liter of oat milk.
This isn't Oatly's first foray into climate labels. The Swedish company, which went public in May 2021 but has seen its stock price fall 89% since, began putting similar climate labels on its vegan products sold in Europe in 2021.
Kunen says the ultimate goal is for customers "to be in a position to compare the climate impact of different products that they can pick up from the grocery aisle, just like they can for nutrition." For that to happen, other companies would need to start disclosing these same details. As of now, few companies share climate footprint information and there's no standard in place for those that do.
But as brands and climate researchers start to engage with effective ways to highlight climate impact through labels, debate still rages over the nutrition equivalent. Just this month, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced plans to launch consumer research into better ways to display nutritional information, including putting the details on the front of packaging.
Zahra Hirji reports for Bloomberg News.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
CFPB Orders Big Banks to Limit Overdraft Fees to $5. But Will Its Edict Stick?
3 minute readUS Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute readGreenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Trending Stories
- 1Appellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud
- 2'Merciless' Filing Deadline Dooms Cuban Americans' Property-Trafficking Suit Against BNP Paribas, SocGen
- 3In 2-1 Ruling, Court Clears Way for Decade-Old Wrongful Imprisonment Suit
- 4Trump Sentencing, TikTok Ban Welcome Justices Back to Work
- 5U.S. Eleventh Circuit Remands Helms-Burton Trafficking Case Involving Confiscated Cuban Port
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250