Florida House Members Back Proposal for More Migrant Flights
The administration of Gov. Ron DeSantis used $615,000 to pay a company to transport two planeloads of migrants last September from San Antonio, Texas, to Martha's Vineyard, with a stop in the Northwest Florida community of Crestview.
February 08, 2023 at 12:41 PM
4 minute read
Nearly five months after Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration sparked controversy by flying about 50 migrants from Texas to Massachusetts, Florida House members started moving forward with a proposal that could help set the stage for more flights.
The Republican-controlled House Appropriations Committee voted along party lines to approve a bill (HB 5B) that would create the "Unauthorized Alien Transport Program" at the state Division of Emergency Management and shift $10 million to fund it.
The bill would address issues that led to a legal challenge after the September flights, including making clear that $1.565 million already spent by the DeSantis administration is "deemed approved."
Republican supporters of the bill blasted the Biden administration's handling of border issues and said they are trying to curb undocumented immigrants coming into Florida. They said the measure is aimed at transporting migrants to "sanctuary" areas of the country.
"In essence, a signal has been sent that the border is open and that folks are welcome. … What I have seen is an abject failure of the Biden administration to do anything with the migrant surge we're seeing at the Southern border," bill sponsor John Snyder, R-Stuart, said.
But Democrats said Florida should not spend money to move migrants from other states and that the bill does not include accountability for how the money would be used.
"This should not be the priority of the state of Florida. It just should not be," Rep. Kelly Skidmore, D-Boca Raton, said. "This feels very stunt-like. It feels very political. It does not feel like it's solving a problem."
Lawmakers last year included $12 million in the state budget for the Department of Transportation to carry out a "program to facilitate the transport of unauthorized aliens from this state." The DeSantis administration used $615,000 of that money to pay Vertol Systems Company Inc. to transport two planeloads of migrants on Sept. 14 from San Antonio, Texas, to Martha's Vineyard, with a stop in the Northwest Florida community of Crestview.
While the state spent $615,000 on the September flights, four additional Vertol purchase orders of $950,000 each are listed on a state contracting website for "relocation services." A House staff analysis Monday said that $1.6 million had been spent as of Jan. 31.
Sen. Jason Pizzo, D-Hollywood, filed a constitutional challenge after the flights drew national attention.
The lawsuit, which remains pending in Leon County circuit court, deals with the interplay of the state budget and substantive laws. The lawsuit contends that part of the budget used to pay for the flights violated the Florida Constitution because it created a new program and changed laws about issues such as contracting.
The new bill, which cleared the House Appropriations Committee on the first day of a special legislative session, would address issues in Pizzo's lawsuit.
As an example, it would repeal the part of the budget that was used as a basis for the flights and would create the Unauthorized Alien Transport Program in law. Also, the remaining money provided in the budget would be funneled back to state coffers, and $10 million would be allocated to the newly created program, effectively swapping out money.
Pizzo said Monday he thinks the bill is designed to scuttle the lawsuit.
"Of course, they're trying to make it moot," Pizzo told reporters.
DeSantis, who is widely mentioned as a potential 2024 presidential candidate, frequently criticizes the Biden administration over immigration issues. In addition to the Pizzo case, the flights have drawn a constitutional challenge in federal court in Massachusetts.
The Senate Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled Tuesday to take up the Senate version of Snyder's bill (SB 6-B).
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readAs Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Charlie Javice Fraud Trial Delayed as Judge Denies Motion to Sever
- 2Holland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
- 3With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Attorneys See Potential for Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 4Trump Signs Executive Order Creating Strategic Digital Asset Reserve
- 5St. Jude Labs Sued for $14.3M for Allegedly Falling Short of Purchase Expectations
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250