House Civil Justice Panel Backs Proposal on Renter Fee Option
Supporters say the measure would provide an option to renters who might not be able to afford security deposits that can stretch into thousands of dollars.
February 10, 2023 at 10:28 AM
3 minute read
As Florida grapples with affordable-housing problems, lawmakers started moving forward with a proposal that could lead to renters paying nonrefundable monthly fees instead of security deposits.
The House Civil Justice Subcommittee voted 13-4 to approve the bill (HB 133), with supporters saying it would provide an option to renters who might not be able to afford security deposits that can stretch into thousands of dollars.
"All this bill does is give them more flexibility in being able to choose their housing options for their family," Rep. Dean Black, R-Jacksonville, said.
But critics said the bill would not cap potential fees and that renters would not recoup the money when they move out like they can with security deposits.
"This would effectively function as a poor tax during a time when Floridians are struggling more than ever to afford their increasing rents," said Jackson Oberlink, a lobbyist for the progressive group Florida Rising.
The House passed a similar bill last year, but the measure did not get through Senate committees. The new bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Mooney, R-Islamorada, is filed for the legislative session that will start March 7.
All of the House panel's Republicans and Rep. Kimberly Daniels, D-Jacksonville, supported the bill Thursday. Four Democrats — Rep. Kristen Arrington of Kissimmee, Rep. Daryl Campbell of Fort Lauderdale, Rep. Ashley Gantt of Miami and Rep. Johanna Lopez of Orlando — opposed it.
The bill would apply to rental agreements that require security deposits. In such situations, landlords would be able to offer the option of paying monthly fees instead of security deposits, though landlords would not be required to do so. Renters would decide whether to pay the fees or deposits.
Also, renters could subsequently decide to pay a security deposit and stop paying the fees, Mooney said.
"This is just an option to get in the front door initially," Mooney said.
LeaseLock, a company that provides insurance to landlords against unpaid rent and tenant damages, is lobbying for the bill. Jon Potter, a representative of LeaseLock, told House members that based on national averages, a tenant who pays $1,500 a month in rent would pay a monthly fee of $25.
"Thousands of tenants have moved into their apartments by paying $1,525 instead of $3,000 or $4,500," Potter said.
But Gantt, who said she is a renter and faced difficulty in finding housing, said the bill does not include a limit on fees.
"My concern with the bill is that landlords don't have any type of guidance with what the fee could be," Gantt said.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Firm Reaches $1.9M Settlement for Protester's Injuries, Pursues Class Action for Others
COVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250