Federal Judge Sides With DeSantis Administration in Immigration Fight
U.S. District Judge T. Kent Wetherell ruled that the Biden administration violated immigration laws through "catch-and-release" policies that led to people being released from detention after crossing the U.S. border with Mexico.
March 09, 2023 at 12:57 PM
5 minute read
Siding largely with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Attorney General Ashley Moody, a federal judge ruled that the Biden administration's handling of immigrants at the Southwest border violates federal law.
Moody's office filed the lawsuit in 2021, alleging that the Biden administration violated immigration laws through "catch-and-release" policies that led to people being released from detention after crossing the U.S. border with Mexico.
The lawsuit centered, in part, on what state lawyers call the Biden administration's "non-detention" policy and a policy known as "Parole Plus Alternatives to Detention," or "Parole+ATD."
U.S. District Judge T. Kent Wetherell issued a 109-page ruling Wednesday that blamed the Biden administration for an influx of migrants and rejected the federal government's rationale for its policies, likening the approach to "a child who kills his parents and then seeks pity for being an orphan."
The lawsuit alleged releasing undocumented immigrants affects Florida because of issues such as increased education, health-care and criminal-justice costs.
Wetherell, a former state appellate judge appointed to the federal bench by former President Donald Trump, found that Florida's claims about the alleged "non-detention policy" were "nonjusticiable" but that the Parole+ATD process violated the federal Immigration and Nationality Act.
The judge put his decision vacating the Parole+ATD policy on hold for seven days, giving the Biden administration time to appeal.
"For the most part, the court finds in favor of Florida because, as detailed below, the evidence establishes that defendants have effectively turned the Southwest border into a meaningless line in the sand and little more than a speed bump for aliens flooding into the country by prioritizing 'alternatives to detention' over actual detention and by releasing more than a million aliens into the country — on 'parole' or pursuant to the exercise of 'prosecutorial discretion' under a wholly inapplicable statute — without even initiating removal proceedings," Wetherell, who is based in Pensacola, wrote.
According to court records, more than 1.16 million immigrants were released under the Biden administration's policies between March 2021 and November 2022, with an estimated 100,000 ending up in Florida.
"Collectively, these actions were akin to posting a flashing, 'Come In, We're Open' sign on the Southern border. The unprecedented 'surge' of aliens that started arriving at the Southwest border almost immediately after President Biden took office and that has continued unabated over the past two years was a predictable consequence of these actions," wrote the judge, who presided over a week-long trial in January.
Wetherell noted the U.S. Department of Homeland Security "has never had sufficient funding to apprehend and detain every alien illegally in the country," and, as a result, was forced to make "tough decisions" about which people to release.
"The fact that DHS must make those 'tough decisions' does not mean that it has free rein to adopt policies that contravene the clear mandates in the INA (Immigration and Nationality Act) or create 'processing pathways' that contort statutory language to effectuate its preferred policy of 'alternatives to detention' over actual detention," the judge wrote.
He also scolded Biden's lawyers for arguing that other administrations have used similar "processing pathways," saying that "as Saint Augustine and William Penn said, "wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it.'"
Wetherell acknowledged that "geopolitical and other factors" contributed to a surge of immigrants at the Southwest border, "but defendants' position that the crisis at the border is not largely of their own making because of their more lenient detention policies is divorced from reality and belied by the evidence."
DeSantis, who cruised to re-election in November and is viewed as a top contender for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, has made the border situation a top issue, both as a candidate and as the state's chief executive.
Wetherell's ruling came a day after the start of the 2023 legislative session, in which Florida lawmakers will consider measures, backed by DeSantis, intended to expand the state's crackdown on illegal immigration.
The governor said recently that he expected the state to prevail in the lawsuit. DeSantis' press secretary, Bryan Griffin, hailed Wetherell's ruling.
"Thanks to the leadership of @GovRonDeSantis and the efforts of @AGAshleyMoody, Florida has held the Biden Administration accountable for failing to defend our nation's borders," Griffin said in a Twitter post.
Moody also applauded Wetherell's decision.
"Today's ruling affirms what we have known all along, President Biden is responsible for the border crisis and his unlawful immigration policies make this country less safe. A federal judge is now ordering Biden to follow the law, and his administration should immediately begin securing the border to protect the American people," she said in a statement.
The issue is rooted in a March 2021 decision by the Biden administration to release immigrants through the use of a "notice to report" to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement within specified periods of time. The decision came amid a strain on processing resources caused by an influx of migrants at the U.S. border.
In November, the Department of Homeland Security replaced the policy with the Parole+ATD process, which allows the conditional release of immigrants who meet certain criteria.
But Wetherell said the federal immigration law "requires detention unless parole is justified based on 'urgent humanitarian reasons' or 'significant public benefit,'" while the Biden administration's approach "effectively allows any alien to be released on parole whenever continued detention is not 'in the public interest' — whatever that means — and the alien is not a security or flight risk."
Dara Kam reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Close Our Borders?' Senate Judiciary Committee Examines Economics, Legal Predicate for Mass Deportation Proposal
3 minute readAnticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readThe Canadian Influx: How Migration to Florida Is Shaping the South Florida Real Estate Market
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250