![A couple who did not want to give their names embrace outside CVE Group as a bus from LaSalle Corrections Transport departs the facility in Allen, Texas. Smiley N. Pool/The Dallas Morning News via AP, File)](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2019/06/Immigration-Arrests-Explainer-Article-201906241431.jpg)
Federal Judge Sides With DeSantis Administration in Immigration Fight
U.S. District Judge T. Kent Wetherell ruled that the Biden administration violated immigration laws through "catch-and-release" policies that led to people being released from detention after crossing the U.S. border with Mexico.
March 09, 2023 at 12:57 PM
5 minute read
Siding largely with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Attorney General Ashley Moody, a federal judge ruled that the Biden administration's handling of immigrants at the Southwest border violates federal law.
Moody's office filed the lawsuit in 2021, alleging that the Biden administration violated immigration laws through "catch-and-release" policies that led to people being released from detention after crossing the U.S. border with Mexico.
The lawsuit centered, in part, on what state lawyers call the Biden administration's "non-detention" policy and a policy known as "Parole Plus Alternatives to Detention," or "Parole+ATD."
U.S. District Judge T. Kent Wetherell issued a 109-page ruling Wednesday that blamed the Biden administration for an influx of migrants and rejected the federal government's rationale for its policies, likening the approach to "a child who kills his parents and then seeks pity for being an orphan."
The lawsuit alleged releasing undocumented immigrants affects Florida because of issues such as increased education, health-care and criminal-justice costs.
Wetherell, a former state appellate judge appointed to the federal bench by former President Donald Trump, found that Florida's claims about the alleged "non-detention policy" were "nonjusticiable" but that the Parole+ATD process violated the federal Immigration and Nationality Act.
The judge put his decision vacating the Parole+ATD policy on hold for seven days, giving the Biden administration time to appeal.
"For the most part, the court finds in favor of Florida because, as detailed below, the evidence establishes that defendants have effectively turned the Southwest border into a meaningless line in the sand and little more than a speed bump for aliens flooding into the country by prioritizing 'alternatives to detention' over actual detention and by releasing more than a million aliens into the country — on 'parole' or pursuant to the exercise of 'prosecutorial discretion' under a wholly inapplicable statute — without even initiating removal proceedings," Wetherell, who is based in Pensacola, wrote.
According to court records, more than 1.16 million immigrants were released under the Biden administration's policies between March 2021 and November 2022, with an estimated 100,000 ending up in Florida.
"Collectively, these actions were akin to posting a flashing, 'Come In, We're Open' sign on the Southern border. The unprecedented 'surge' of aliens that started arriving at the Southwest border almost immediately after President Biden took office and that has continued unabated over the past two years was a predictable consequence of these actions," wrote the judge, who presided over a week-long trial in January.
Wetherell noted the U.S. Department of Homeland Security "has never had sufficient funding to apprehend and detain every alien illegally in the country," and, as a result, was forced to make "tough decisions" about which people to release.
"The fact that DHS must make those 'tough decisions' does not mean that it has free rein to adopt policies that contravene the clear mandates in the INA (Immigration and Nationality Act) or create 'processing pathways' that contort statutory language to effectuate its preferred policy of 'alternatives to detention' over actual detention," the judge wrote.
He also scolded Biden's lawyers for arguing that other administrations have used similar "processing pathways," saying that "as Saint Augustine and William Penn said, "wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it.'"
Wetherell acknowledged that "geopolitical and other factors" contributed to a surge of immigrants at the Southwest border, "but defendants' position that the crisis at the border is not largely of their own making because of their more lenient detention policies is divorced from reality and belied by the evidence."
DeSantis, who cruised to re-election in November and is viewed as a top contender for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, has made the border situation a top issue, both as a candidate and as the state's chief executive.
Wetherell's ruling came a day after the start of the 2023 legislative session, in which Florida lawmakers will consider measures, backed by DeSantis, intended to expand the state's crackdown on illegal immigration.
The governor said recently that he expected the state to prevail in the lawsuit. DeSantis' press secretary, Bryan Griffin, hailed Wetherell's ruling.
"Thanks to the leadership of @GovRonDeSantis and the efforts of @AGAshleyMoody, Florida has held the Biden Administration accountable for failing to defend our nation's borders," Griffin said in a Twitter post.
Moody also applauded Wetherell's decision.
"Today's ruling affirms what we have known all along, President Biden is responsible for the border crisis and his unlawful immigration policies make this country less safe. A federal judge is now ordering Biden to follow the law, and his administration should immediately begin securing the border to protect the American people," she said in a statement.
The issue is rooted in a March 2021 decision by the Biden administration to release immigrants through the use of a "notice to report" to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement within specified periods of time. The decision came amid a strain on processing resources caused by an influx of migrants at the U.S. border.
In November, the Department of Homeland Security replaced the policy with the Parole+ATD process, which allows the conditional release of immigrants who meet certain criteria.
But Wetherell said the federal immigration law "requires detention unless parole is justified based on 'urgent humanitarian reasons' or 'significant public benefit,'" while the Biden administration's approach "effectively allows any alien to be released on parole whenever continued detention is not 'in the public interest' — whatever that means — and the alien is not a security or flight risk."
Dara Kam reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business? Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/c6/09/887e18ff42bda2b42ebaaf3e0681/immigration-ice-detention-3-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute read![EB-5 Rebounds After a Rocky Year: Challenges of 2024 Lay Groundwork for a Booming 2025 EB-5 Rebounds After a Rocky Year: Challenges of 2024 Lay Groundwork for a Booming 2025](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/d2/e0/669ec6734d1997dc3185ea3f5f50/jill-jones-767x633-1.jpg)
EB-5 Rebounds After a Rocky Year: Challenges of 2024 Lay Groundwork for a Booming 2025
!['Close Our Borders?' Senate Judiciary Committee Examines Economics, Legal Predicate for Mass Deportation Proposal 'Close Our Borders?' Senate Judiciary Committee Examines Economics, Legal Predicate for Mass Deportation Proposal](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2023/05/committee-judiciary-hearing-room-dirksen-01-767x633.jpg)
'Close Our Borders?' Senate Judiciary Committee Examines Economics, Legal Predicate for Mass Deportation Proposal
3 minute read![Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/8f/68/66689d714570916b8a9ea701dac3/us-immigration-3287-767x633.jpg)
Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Always Be Willing to Work Harder Than the Person Next to You,' Says Esther Cho of Stradley Ronon
- 2People in the News—Feb. 10, 2025—Flaster Greenberg, Tucker Arensberg
- 3The Support Center for Child Advocates Welcomes New Executive Director
- 4'Shame on Us': Lawyer Hits Hard After Judge's Suicide
- 5Upholding the Integrity of the Rule of Law Amid Trump 2.0
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250