DeSantis Promises to 'Swing for the Fences' in State-of-State Address
"We will stand strong, we will hold the line, we won't back down, and I can promise you this: You ain't seen nothin' yet," Gov. Ron DeSantis said.
March 13, 2023 at 11:55 AM
5 minute read
State and Local GovernmentSetting the tone for a legislative session in which Republicans have unprecedented supermajorities in the House and Senate, Gov. Ron DeSantis promised to "swing for the fences" as he delivered his fifth State of the State address.
"We will stand strong, we will hold the line, we won't back down, and I can promise you this: You ain't seen nothin' yet," DeSantis said, eliciting applause in the crowded House chamber.
DeSantis, who was captain of the Yale University baseball team, is now the undisputed skipper of the Republican-controlled Legislature, and the House and Senate backed up his pledge to come out swinging. The same day the governor delivered his annual remarks to lawmakers, GOP lawmakers filed controversial proposals that would prevent abortions after six weeks of pregnancy and carry out DeSantis' crackdown on immigration.
The abortion bills (SB 300 and HB 7) came after the Republican-controlled Legislature last year passed a ban on abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The proposed restrictions are almost certain to make abortion one of the most-contentious issues of the 60-day legislative session.
Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, issued a statement Tuesday blasting the proposed six-week limit.
"Florida Republicans have once again demonstrated a complete disregard for the women of our state and for our collective freedoms," Eskamani said. "As we've already seen in other states, a six-week ban is extreme, dangerous and will force millions of people out of state to seek care and others will be forced into pregnancy. Most people do not even know they are pregnant until after six weeks, so this six-week ban might as well be a complete ban."
The current 15-week abortion restriction is the subject of a constitutional challenge by seven abortion clinics and a doctor. The Florida Supreme Court in January agreed to take up the challenge.
In addition to the constitutional issues, the 15-week limit has drawn criticism because it does not include exemptions for victims of rape or incest. The six-week restriction proposed last week would allow abortions up to 15 weeks of pregnancy in cases of rape or incest, but they would require women to present proof that they were victims.
During a news conference after his State of the State address, DeSantis called the exceptions "sensible, and we welcome pro-life legislation."
The immigration-related proposals were filed by Sen. Blaise Ingoglia, R-Spring Hill, and Rep. Kiyan Michael, R-Jacksonville.
The measures (SB 1718 and HB 1617) would make changes such as preventing counties and municipalities from funding organizations that issue identification to people who don't have "proof of lawful presence in the United States."
As DeSantis set the tone for Republicans, outnumbered Democrats last week accused the governor of using his bully pulpit to build toward a potential 2024 run for president.
House Minority Leader Fentrice Driskell, D-Tampa, told reporters after the State of the State address that DeSantis is "solely focused on running for the GOP nomination for president, and that's how he's governing right now as families suffer."
STRANGE BEDFELLOWS
The session's sizzling start continued to heat up last week, as the House and Senate teed up proposals that would allow Floridians to carry concealed firearms without licenses. The bills are ready for consideration in both chambers.
Under long-standing Florida law, gun owners have needed to obtain state concealed-weapons licenses to carry guns, a process that has included completing training courses and passing background checks. The bills (SB 150, HB 543) would scrap the requirements, though it says people carrying guns would have to be able to display valid identification "upon demand by a law enforcement officer."
The measures have united two groups on polar opposite sides of the issue in opposition to the bills.
On one side, gun-control advocates have criticized the elimination of the training requirement.
Several members of the group Moms Demand Action, which was formed after the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Connecticut, opposed the bill during a final Senate committee hearing Thursday.
"It's downright shameful to push forward this dangerous legislation that will eliminate our decades-long permitting system," Katie Hathaway, a Moms Demand Action member, said.
At the other end of the spectrum, gun-rights advocates have been riled by what they say is a misapplication of the "constitutional carry" label given to the measure by its supporters and argue that the proposals don't go far enough. The gun-rights advocates have called for what is known as "open carry," which would not require firearms to be concealed.
DeSantis signaled last week that he would support an open-carry proposal. But he also indicated he would approve a concealed-carry bill. The governor's comments, and his widely rumored potential run for president, were cited by open-carry supporters during the Senate hearing.
"If the governor cannot get a very friendly legislature to add open carry to this bill, then how do we think he will do trying to convince Congress to act on anything if he were to become president? If open carry isn't added to this bill, it shows political impotence on the part of Gov. DeSantis," said Matt Collins, a Winter Park resident who addressed the Senate panel.
Meanwhile, the National Rifle Association, the Florida Sheriffs Association and the Florida Police Chiefs Association have been among groups supporting the current proposal.
Senate sponsor Jay Collins, R-Tampa, maintained that reducing barriers to being able to carry a firearm will help law-abiding citizens protect themselves.
Ryan Dailey reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Firm Reaches $1.9M Settlement for Protester's Injuries, Pursues Class Action for Others
Trending Stories
- 1The Appropriate Exemption in Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College
- 2DOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
- 3New Partners at Cummings & Lockwood, Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey
- 4'Extra Government'?: NY Top Court Eyes Ethics Commission's Constitutionality
- 5South Texas College of Law Houston Selects New Dean
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250