House Takes Aim at Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Higher Education
"Members, we can have debates about DEI all we want. I welcome those debates. But to insert the state in curriculum, that is a problem," said Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, who questioned the constitutionality of the bill's prohibitions on teaching certain topics.
March 14, 2023 at 12:48 PM
4 minute read
EducationA controversial bill that would carry out Gov. Ron DeSantis' push to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in state colleges and universities began moving forward Monday in the Florida House, while students came out in force to oppose it.
Hours before the Republican-dominated Postsecondary Education & Workforce Subcommittee voted 12-5 to approve the measure (HB 999), DeSantis and top higher-education officials touted the House bill and a similar Senate measure during a media event.
"These bills effectively eliminate DEI and other types of discriminatory programs and activities. But it also prohibits soliciting pledges of DEI or CRT [critical race theory] or any political viewpoint that's a condition of hiring, promotion or admissions," DeSantis said, flanked by the leaders of the state's college and university systems.
DeSantis has long sought to prevent critical race theory in Florida classrooms. In January, he ratcheted up his focus on DEI, in part by directing higher-education officials to detail expenditures, programs and staff related to such initiatives.
DeSantis, who is widely considered to be a contender for president in 2024, has used his fight against CRT, which is based on the premise that racism is embedded in American institutions, as a linchpin of his education agenda.
The House bill would require the state university system's Board of Governors to "periodically review the mission" of each university, a process that would involve an examination of academic programs. The board would direct universities to "remove from its programs any major or minor that is based on or otherwise utilizes pedagogical methodology associated with critical [race] theory," a concept that the bill attempts to flesh out.
CRT encompasses various concepts, according to the bill, including critical race studies, critical ethnic studies, radical feminist theory, radical gender theory, queer theory, critical social justice and intersectionality.
Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, questioned the constitutionality of the bill's prohibitions on teaching certain topics.
"Members, we can have debates about DEI all we want. I welcome those debates. But to insert the state in curriculum, that is a problem. Not only is it a problem when it comes to the First Amendment rights of professors to teach, but also the First Amendment rights of students to listen," Eskamani said.
The measure also seeks to prevent state colleges and universities from spending any state or federal funds on programs or campus activities that advocate for DEI, promote or espouse "political or social activism" or give preferential treatment to people based on factors such as race or sex.
Florida's 12 universities collectively reported spending more than $34.5 million on programs related to DEI. The schools also reported 279 paid positions tied to the initiatives.
Numerous students were among the roughly 150 people who signed up to testify Monday about the bill, with the vast majority of people opposing the measure. Subcommittee Chairwoman Lauren Melo, R-Naples, gave each speaker 30 seconds to address the panel.
Maxx Fenning, a student at the University of Florida and president of LGBTQ-advocacy group PRISM FL, criticized the part of the bill that would eliminate instruction on various topics.
"Whether you agree with these ideas or not, they are a component of understanding the wide array of views and opinions on issues that affect our daily lives," Fenning said.
The effort to nix DEI programs already has begun at New College of Florida. DeSantis in January appointed a slate of six conservative allies to the university's board of trustees. The board subsequently decided to shutter the Office of Outreach and Inclusive Excellence at the small liberal-arts school.
State university system Chancellor Ray Rodrigues, who joined DeSantis at Monday's media event, endorsed the governor's fight against DEI programs. Rodrigues said such initiatives, in practice, are "exclusionary, not inclusive."
"Instead of being unifying, we see it as being divisive, an attempt to cancel and censor those who don't agree. It's become a means to advocate a political ideology of the left," Rodrigues said.
The Senate Education Postsecondary Committee is slated Wednesday to take up the Senate version of the bill (SB 266).
Ryan Dailey reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSt. Thomas University Settles With Fired Professor Who Had Alleged Academic Freedom Violations and Discrimination
9 minute readEx-St. Thomas Univ. Law Professor Sues School Over Firing, Alleging Defamation
4 minute read'It's a Great Day to Be a Gator Lawyer': UF Takes Top Spot on Bar Exam
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250