Campground Owners Could Get 'Inherent Risk' Legal Shield From Lawsuits
"Passing this bill is not going to result in campground owners suddenly wanting to throw you in holes, feed you to wild animals, let you fall into hornet's nests and so on," bill sponsor Rep. Dean Black said. "It will restore sanity to camping. It will protect camping."
March 21, 2023 at 01:29 PM
3 minute read
With the proposal pointing to "inherent risk," a Florida House panel approved a bill that would help shield campground owners from lawsuits about people getting injured or killed while camping.
"Passing this bill is not going to result in campground owners suddenly wanting to throw you in holes, feed you to wild animals, let you fall into hornet's nests and so on," bill sponsor Dean Black, R-Jacksonville said. "It will restore sanity to camping. It will protect camping."
The Republican-controlled House Civil Justice Subcommittee voted 11-5 along party lines to approve the bill (HB 1323). Sen. Alexis Calatayud, R-Miami, has filed a similar bill (SB 1054), which has not been heard in Senate committees as the 60-day legislative session enters its third week.
Rep. Daryl Campbell, D-Fort Lauderdale, expressed concern about taking the "responsibility off the camp owners."
"At some point, we have to make sure or put in some stipulations that ensures that these campground operators are actually going around, checking their facility, making sure that they are aware of what's becoming more of a safety hazard for their guests that are coming here to enjoy some quality time with their family and get away from … the real world," Campbell said.
The panel approved the bill three days after the House passed a wide-ranging plan (HB 837) designed to help prevent costly lawsuits against businesses and insurance companies. But Black's bill is narrowly focused on campgrounds.
The proposal lists a series of factors described as an "inherent risk of camping" and would provide legal immunity to campground operators for injuries, deaths or property damage related to those factors. The factors include such things as natural bodies of water, campfires, trees and uneven terrain.
The bill would require campground operators to provide notice about the "inherent risk" of camping. Also, it would not shield operators in circumstances such as committing an "act or omission that constitutes willful and wanton disregard for the safety of another person" that results in injury or death.
Black linked the bill to an increase in camping during the COVID-19 pandemic. He said that resulted in an increase in litigation and threats of litigation against campground operators. He also said the bill was modeled after an already-existing law about agritourism.
"Many of our campgrounds operate on very thin margins," Black said. "They don't make a lot of money."
But Todd Michaels, representing the Florida Justice Association plaintiffs' attorneys group, raised concerns that the bill takes "the law of premises liability and flips it on its head."
"I just fear how that precedent will start applying when the amusement-park industry comes forward and says, 'Well, we've got inherently dangerous conditions. We should no longer have to act reasonably, either,'" Michaels said.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Firm Reaches $1.9M Settlement for Protester's Injuries, Pursues Class Action for Others
COVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250