Senate Passes Bill Aimed at Blocking Drag Shows From Admitting Kids
The bill would allow state regulators to immediately suspend or revoke licenses of restaurants, bars and other venues that violate the law.
April 12, 2023 at 12:40 PM
5 minute read
With the bill sponsor saying children can't "unsee" indecent behavior, the Senate approved a measure aimed at blocking venues from admitting kids to "adult live performances."
While the proposal (SB 1438) doesn't specifically mention drag shows, the bill defines "adult live performances" as "any show, exhibition, or other presentation that is performed in front of a live audience and in whole or in part, depicts or simulates nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement, specific sexual activities, … lewd conduct, or the lewd exposure of prosthetic or imitation genitals or breasts."
It also has moved forward after Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration took steps such as filing a complaint against the Hyatt Regency Miami hotel for hosting a "Drag Queen Christmas" event in December, alleging minors were allowed to see the show. The complaint seeks to have the hotel's liquor license revoked.
The Republican-controlled Senate voted 28-12 along party lines to pass the bill, a day after Rep. Webster Barnaby, R-Deltona, likened transgender men and women to "mutants," "demons" and "imps" during debate on a separate proposal that would restrict which bathrooms people can use.
The live-performance bill, sponsored by Jacksonville Republican Clay Yarborough, also would prohibit local governments from issuing public permits for events that could expose children to the targeted behavior. Critics said that could effectively shut down local pride parades.
The bill, one of more than 400 pieces of legislation nationwide aimed at transgender people and the LGBTQ community, is among a number of proposals being considered during Florida's 60-day legislative session, which is scheduled to end May 5.
The bill would allow state regulators to immediately suspend or revoke licenses of restaurants, bars and other venues that violate the law.
During debate Tuesday, Senate Democrats warned that arguments used to boost support for the restrictions could have dangerous consequences for trans people, who already are at risk for violence.
Drag shows and trans people are the "target du jour" of Republican-led legislatures across the country, Sen. Tina Polsky, D-Boca Raton, said.
"The bill is, as usual, so purposefully vague as to create an administrative nightmare and seeks to chill all of those [drag] shows," Polsky said. "This bill feeds into that kind of dangerous rhetoric, and it will lead to violence. Here is yet another example of big government going too far to take away our freedom. There's no other way to describe it."
Polsky and other Democrats pointed to comments made Monday by Barnaby during a House committee discussion of a bill that seeks to prevent transgender men and women from using bathrooms that don't align with their sex assigned at birth.
"We have people that live among us today on planet Earth that are happy to display themselves as if they were mutants from another planet," said Barnaby, calling himself a "proud Christian conservative Republican."
Barnaby spoke after trans men and women testified against the bill. Citing the Bible, Barnaby called them "demons and imps who come and parade before us and pretend that you are part of this world."
Sen. Shevrin Jones, a West Park Democrat who is gay, called Barnaby's "demonization" of trans men and women "shameful" and railed against Republicans for failing to censure the remarks.
"That type of vitriol is coming because that is the type of climate that has been created in this country. That is the type of climate that we are creating in this state to where we are basically giving people a hall pass to say crazy things like that," Jones said.
Pointing to the Bible, Jones, whose father is a pastor, urged Barnaby and other lawmakers to "give grace to people. And that does not mean grace to people you agree with. God-dog it, that means grace to even people you don't agree with."
Yarborough, who was the only Republican who participated in Tuesday's Senate debate on the bill, said "the violence and the name calling … is not acceptable. And I condemn that. That is not a Christ-like response, and I'm totally proud and fine with saying that on the record."
But, Yarborough argued, the bill is necessary to protect children, likening the proposed restrictions to covering electrical outlets to prevent kids from being physically harmed.
"We can't unsee, we can't unhear and we can't un-experience the stuff that goes into our minds," Yarborough said. "As lawmakers we have a responsibility to protect children from conduct that is patently offensive to prevailing standards in our communities."
Jon Harris Maurer, public policy director of LGBTQ-advocacy group Equality Florida, told The News Service of Florida the bill "seeks to put the government in place" of parental decision-making about content children see.
A House committee was expected to consider a similar bill (HB 1423) on Wednesday.
The Senate last week also passed a plan that would bar doctors and other health-care providers from offering treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy to transgender minors.
Maurer said the measures targeting drag shows and LGBTQ people are politically motivated to help DeSantis, a potential Republican presidential candidate in 2024, in a GOP primary against former President Donald Trump.
"It is about partisan politics. And the anti-drag bill is an illustration of this manufactured moral panic," Maurer said.
Dara Kam reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
Wachtell Helps Miami Dolphins Secure One of NFL’s First Private Equity Deals
3 minute read$1,575 Daily Interest Is Being Added in This Landmark Miami Case
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250