US Supreme Court Asked to Halt Execution
If the execution is carried out, Darryl Barwick, 56, would be the third inmate put to death by lethal injection in less than three months.
May 03, 2023 at 11:06 AM
4 minute read
Attorneys for death row inmate Darryl Barwick have gone to the U.S. Supreme Court in a last-ditch attempt to halt his scheduled Wednesday execution in the 1986 murder of a woman in Bay County.
In documents filed Friday, the attorneys requested a stay of execution and urged justices to consider issues related to Florida's clemency process. The filings came after a federal district judge and an appeals court refused to block the execution because of the clemency-related issues.
The Florida Supreme Court on Friday rejected other arguments aimed at halting the execution.
Barwick's attorneys contended in the U.S. Supreme Court filings that Barwick's due-process rights were violated because of a "standardless" clemency process. They wrote that the state has not granted clemency to any people sentenced to death in 40 years.
"Due process requires that Mr. Barwick be provided a proceeding where the standards are clear and include considerations beyond the condemned's guilt," one of the filings said. "Clemency is a critical stage of the death penalty scheme. It is the only stage at which factors like remorse, rehabilitation, racial and geographic influences, and other factors that the legal system does not correct can be considered."
Barwick's attorneys also pointed to Barwick having a "neurodevelopmental disorder" that affected his psychological development and that he suffered abuse as a child. He had a clemency interview in 2021.
"The lack of standards and the false guidance provided to Mr. Barwick during the clemency process deprived him of the limited due process to which he was entitled," Barwick's attorneys wrote. "That deprivation rendered Mr. Barwick's clemency process meaningless and reduced the proceedings to a mile marker on the road to his execution. It also illustrates the constitutionally defective nature of a critical aspect of Florida's death penalty scheme. Mr. Barwick's clemency proceedings equaled nothing more than a coin-flip where both sides of the coin reflected: 'denied.' This standardless process, taken with the circumstances in Barwick's case, establish a due process violation that cannot be tolerated."
But in a response filed Saturday, Attorney General Ashley Moody's office disputed the due-process arguments and also pointed to Barwick's criminal history. He was sentenced to death for stabbing Rebecca Wendt in her Panama City apartment shortly after being released from prison for raping another woman at knifepoint in 1983, the response said.
"Indeed, Barwick's case is a uniquely poor vehicle to address clemency-related due process because every federal court to look at his pleadings before now agrees that he would likely not receive clemency even if due process required the standards he seeks to impose," Moody's office argued. "That assessment is backed by the horrific, escalating nature of Barwick's crimes from burglary and sexual battery at knifepoint in 1983 to burglary, attempted sexual battery and murder by stabbing in 1986 less than three months after being released from prison."
In refusing to stay the execution last month, U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle rejected Barwick's arguments.
"Mr. Barwick was allowed to make a written submission and to appear in person for an interview with representatives of the clemency board," Hinkle wrote. "In this proceeding, Mr. Barwick has not alleged he was denied the opportunity to present any information he wished to present. He has alleged no facts suggesting the members of the clemency board made their decision based on anything other than the merits."
Gov. Ron DeSantis on April 4 signed a death warrant for Barwick, with the execution scheduled for 6 p.m. Wednesday at Florida State Prison. Wendt was found wrapped in a comforter and had been stabbed 37 times. DeSantis, in signing the death warrant, denied clemency, according to court documents.
The Florida Supreme Court on Friday turned down a series of arguments, including that Barwick should be shielded from execution because of what his attorneys described as "lifelong severe mental illness [neurodevelopmental/neurocognitive disorder] accompanied by immutable cognitive deficits and low mental age."
If the execution is carried out, Barwick, 56, would be the third inmate put to death by lethal injection in less than three months.
Louis Gaskin was executed April 12 in the 1989 murders of a couple in Flagler County. The state on Feb. 23 put to death Donald David Dillbeck, who murdered a woman in 1990 during a carjacking in a Tallahassee mall parking lot.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readUS Judge OKs Partial Release of Ex-Special Counsel's Final Report in Election Case
3 minute readSpecial Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250