Florida Supreme Court Allows Lawsuit Over Football Player's Death
A 19-year-old Stetson University football player collapsed and died on the sideline during a 2017 practice.
June 05, 2023 at 12:05 PM
3 minute read
Cases and CourtsThe Florida Supreme Court declined to take up an appeal by Stetson University in a case stemming from the death of a 19-year-old football player who collapsed on the sideline during a 2017 practice.
The decision effectively let stand a ruling by the Fifth District Court of Appeal that cleared the way for the family of Nick Blakely to pursue a lawsuit against Stetson. As is common, the Supreme Court did not detail its reasons.
Blakely, a sophomore accounting major from Lawrenceville, Georgia, pulled himself out of a practice on Aug. 28, 2017, and complained to an assistant athletic trainer that he felt dizzy and his chest felt tight, according to the appeals-court ruling. On the sideline, the assistant athletic trainer took Blakely's pulse, gave him water and had him stand in the shade.
After resting for about 45 minutes, Blakely collapsed. Stetson workers tried to revive Blakely, but he died at a hospital.
Blakely's family filed a lawsuit alleging negligence by the university. A Volusia County circuit judge in 2021 said Stetson was shielded by releases that Blakely signed to play football, but the 5th District Court of Appeal in December 2022 overturned that decision.
The appeals court said what is known as an exculpatory clause in the releases "did not expressly inform Blakely that by executing the document at issue, he would be contracting away his right to sue Stetson for Stetson's own negligence." Also, the ruling said other parts of the releases made the exculpatory clause "unclear and ambiguous."
Stetson in March asked the Supreme Court to take up the case, arguing that the Fifth District Court of Appeal's decision conflicted with rulings by other appellate courts in cases involving the Broward County School Board and the Monroe County School Board.
"In each case, the district courts interpreted contractual language that is not meaningfully distinguishable from the language of the releases that Nicholas [Blakely] signed to reach the conclusion that any claim for negligence against the school board for injuries arising out of the students' participation in the schools' athletic programs was barred," Stetson's attorneys wrote.
But attorneys for the Blakely family disputed that a conflict existed with the school-board cases, saying the "language in those releases is vastly different from the language in the Stetson releases."
Also, the family's attorneys alleged in a March brief that "Nick died due to the repeated negligent failures by Stetson to recognize the warning signs presented by Nick's condition and to take the necessary actions to protect him at times while he was not engaged in the activity of playing, practicing, or participating in football. The negligence that caused Nick's death began months before when he complained of chest pain and difficulty breathing to Stetson and Stetson did nothing in response to these complaints, just as they did on the morning of his death when he complained of concerning cardiac symptoms."
The website of the Nick Blakely Foundation said the player had an enlarged heart, which led to sudden cardiac arrest. The foundation tries to raise awareness about sudden cardiac arrest and works on issues such as ensuring access to automated external defibrillators and setting training standards and safety protocols in athletic associations and schools, according to the website.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Trending Stories
- 1People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
- 2How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be a Lawyer First, Foremost and Always,' Says Matthew McLaughlin of Venable
- 3Bar Report - Dec. 23
- 4Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 5The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250