Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal entered a per curiam opinion that sanctioned a self-represented attorney litigant in a negligence lawsuit.

And while the per curiam opinion on sanctions—under rules governing motions for rehearing and regulating lawyer statements impugning the qualifications and integrity of judges—were both “soundly reasoned and institutionally prudent,” it was noteworthy for its avoidance on vital issues underpinning them, said Anthony V. Alfieri of the University of Miami School of Law.

Anthony V. Alfieri of the University of Miami School of Law. (Credit: J. Albert Diaz/ALM) Anthony V. Alfieri of the University of Miami School of Law. (Credit: J. Albert Diaz/ALM)

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]