Education Dept. Targets TikTok, Adult Performances at Schools
Using TikTok would be prohibited on district devices or over schools' internet and the app also could not be "used to communicate or promote any school district, school, school-sponsored club, extracurricular organization, or athletic team."
June 28, 2023 at 11:54 AM
4 minute read
The state Department of Education released a series of proposed rules that would outline restrictions on "adult live performances" at field trips, prohibit school districts from using the social-media app TikTok and allow parents to control "any deviation from their child's legal name" in schools.
Some of the proposed rules stem from controversial new state laws set to go into effect Saturday.
The proposal dealing with adult live performances was spurred by a law (SB 1438) aimed at blocking children from attending drag shows.
Gov. Ron DeSantis touted the change in a May 17 press release announcing the signing of the live performance bill and other measures.
"Florida is proud to lead the way in standing up for our children," DeSantis said in the release. "As the world goes mad, Florida represents a refuge of sanity and a citadel of normalcy."
The proposed rule puts guidelines on "school-sponsored events or activities" which include things such as field trips and extracurricular activities. The proposal includes provisions that would bar districts from admitting "a child to an adult live performance" and prevent such performances from being held in buildings or properties owned or leased by districts.
The proposed regulation seeks to bolster procedures related to how parents are notified about field trips and other activities.
The proposal would require that parents are provided with permission forms that spell out details such as "the nature of the event" or activity, specific locations and types of sponsors and guests that would be present, and the method of student supervision provided, including the anticipated number of chaperones.
Democrats and other critics of the law targeting drag performances decried it as part of a slate of legislation that targets LGBTQ Floridians.
Sen. Shevrin Jones, D-Miami Gardens, issued a statement blasting the measure on the day DeSantis signed it.
"These continued attacks on the LGBTQ community and young people are at the center of DeSantis' misplaced priorities and wildly out of step with where Floridians actually are on these issues," Jones said at the time.
Another proposed rule teed up by the education department would put in place requirements for internet safety policies that school districts will have to adopt.
The policies would apply to students' internet use on devices owned by districts, and on devices owned by students when connected to internet provided by schools.
In part, districts' guidelines would have to prohibit students from "accessing social media platforms, except when expressly directed by a teacher for an educational purpose."
The proposed rule also specifically targets the popular social-media app TikTok. DeSantis and other state leaders have taken steps to curtail the use of TikTok in government facilities.
Under the proposal, using TikTok would be prohibited on district devices or over schools' internet and the app also could not be "used to communicate or promote any school district, school, school-sponsored club, extracurricular organization, or athletic team."
The proposal comes after DeSantis in May signed a measure (HB 379) that, in part, sought to ban the use of the TikTok app on school grounds.
A third rule that seeks to "ensure the use of the child's legal name in school or a parent-approved nickname" was among the slate of proposals published by the education department Tuesday.
The proposal would amend an existing rule related to student records by adding a provision that would require school boards to adopt policies "for parents to specify the use of any deviation from their child's legal name in school."
"School districts will develop a form to obtain parental consent along with any required documentation, as appropriate," a draft of the proposed change says.
A description of the potential rule said it is intended to strengthen the rights of parents.
"This rule will ensure full transparency to enhance the student's record and protect parental rights," a notice of the proposal said.
Hearings to discuss the proposed rules are scheduled for July 19 in Orlando.
Ryan Dailey reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSt. Thomas University Settles With Fired Professor Who Had Alleged Academic Freedom Violations and Discrimination
9 minute readEx-St. Thomas Univ. Law Professor Sues School Over Firing, Alleging Defamation
4 minute read'It's a Great Day to Be a Gator Lawyer': UF Takes Top Spot on Bar Exam
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250