DeSantis Administration Appeals Judge's 'Drag Queen' Law Ruling
While the law does not specifically mention drag shows, it came after the DeSantis administration cracked down on venues in South Florida and Central Florida where children attended drag shows.
June 30, 2023 at 01:18 PM
4 minute read
Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration is appealing a federal judge's ruling that blocked a new law aimed at prohibiting children from attending drag shows, and is seeking to carry out the law while the appeal is pending.
Attorney General Ashley Moody's office on Tuesday filed a notice that is a first step in appealing a preliminary injunction issued last week by U.S. District Judge Gregory Presnell in a lawsuit filed by the Orlando restaurant Hamburger Mary's.
Lawyers in Moody's office on Wednesday filed a motion seeking a stay, which would allow the state to enforce the law except against Hamburger Mary's. If granted by Presnell, the stay would remain in effect while the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit considers the case.
The motion said the "injunction also sweeps beyond plaintiff [Hamburger Mary's] to nonparties who may wish to expose children to live obscene performances in violation of the statute. The portion of the injunction that applies to nonparties threatens Florida, and the children Florida enacted the law to protect, with irreparable harm, and is beyond the court's remedial authority."
Presnell issued an order Thursday requiring attorneys for Hamburger Mary's to respond to the motion by July 10.
The law, dubbed by sponsors the "Protection of Children" bill, would prevent venues from admitting children to adult live performances. It defines adult live performances as "any show, exhibition, or other presentation that is performed in front of a live audience, which, in whole or in part, depicts or simulates nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement or specific sexual activities … lewd conduct, or the lewd exposure of prosthetic or imitation genitals or breasts."
Regulators would be able to suspend or revoke licenses of restaurants, bars and other venues that violate the law. Also, it would prohibit local governments from issuing public permits for events that could expose children to the targeted behavior.
Hamburger Mary's, which says it has run "family friendly" drag shows for 15 years, filed the court challenge last month, contending the law violates First Amendment rights. Presnell agreed, saying in part the law is not "sufficiently narrowly tailored" to meet First Amendment standards.
While the law does not specifically mention drag shows, it came after the DeSantis administration cracked down on venues in South Florida and Central Florida where children attended drag shows. As an example, the administration targeted the liquor license of the Hyatt Regency Miami hotel and Orlando's Plaza Live for hosting "Drag Queen Christmas" events in December.
In issuing the preliminary injunction, Presnell wrote that law "is specifically designed to suppress the speech of drag queen performers" and the state "already has statutes" that protect children from seeing obscene performances.
"Defendant professes that a statewide preliminary injunction would 'harm the public by exposing children to 'adult live performances,'" Presnell wrote. "This concern rings hollow, however, when accompanied by the knowledge that Florida state law, presently and independently of the instant [new] statutory scheme, permits any minor to attend an R-rated film at a movie theater if accompanied by a parent or guardian. Such R-rated films routinely convey content at least as objectionable as that covered by [the new law]."
The law took effect May 17, but Presnell's injunction barred the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation from "instituting, maintaining, or prosecuting any enforcement proceedings under the act until further order of the court following a trial on the merits of this case."
In addition, he rejected a motion by the state to dismiss the lawsuit.
The state's notice of appeal, as is common, does not detail arguments it will make at the Atlanta-based appeals court. Along with challenging the preliminary injunction, the state is appealing the denial of its motion to dismiss the case, the notice said.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250