DeSantis Signs Controversial Phosphogypsum, Local Ordinance Bills
The measure, which drew opposition from environmental groups, will require the Florida Department of Transportation to study the use of phosphogypsum, which includes radioactive elements, in road-construction "aggregate" material.
June 30, 2023 at 01:33 PM
4 minute read
Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a controversial measure that directs transportation officials to determine if a waste byproduct from the fertilizer industry could be used in building roads.
The measure (HB 1191), which drew opposition from environmental groups, will require the Florida Department of Transportation to study the use of phosphogypsum in road-construction "aggregate" material. The department will have to finish the evaluation by April 1.
Phosphogypsum includes radioactive elements and is stored in huge stacks. It drew heavy attention in 2021 when about 215 million gallons of wastewater were discharged into Tampa Bay to avoid a potentially catastrophic breach at the closed Piney Point phosphate plant in Manatee County.
"Our goal is to hopefully identify this as a suitable road base so that we don't continue to just stack it and have these things that could potentially become Piney Point, and that we're able to pull out some bad stuff and use it, you know, for a road base that's safe," Senate bill sponsor Jay Trumbull, R-Panama City, said while debating the proposal on May 1.
But Elise Bennett, an attorney who is Florida and Caribbean director for the Center for Biological Diversity, issued a statement Thursday that blasted the bill.
"By signing off on this reckless handout to the fertilizer industry, Gov. DeSantis is paving the way to a toxic legacy generations of Floridians will have to grapple with," Bennett said. "This opens the door for dangerous radioactive waste to be dumped in roadways across the state, under the guise of a so-called feasibility study that won't address serious health and safety concerns."
In 2021, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency barred the use of phosphogypsum in road construction. A state Senate staff analysis said in April that "until such time as the EPA approves such use, the FDOT [Florida Department of Transportation] would be prohibited from any use of phosphogypsum as a road construction aggregate material. Such use could only occur if the EPA issues an approval, and only under the conditions imposed by the EPA."
Trumbull said the material is already used in countries, including Japan, Australia, Canada and Spain.
Meanwhile, DeSantis on Thursday signed a bill (SB 170) that could boost legal challenges to local ordinances. Among other things, the bill would require local governments to suspend enforcement of ordinances that are challenged legally. It would not apply to several types of ordinances, such as measures needed to comply with federal or state laws or regulations.
When the bill was debated May 3 on the House floor, Rep. Robbie Brackett, a Vero Beach Republican who sponsored the House version, said local officials don't have a right to "impose onerous ordinances on other people."
"What this does is it allows the stakeholders of that community a vehicle to take action and stand against local governments that go too far," said Brackett, a former Vero Beach mayor.
But critics said the bill, which will take effect Oct. 1, could limit local governments' ability to address issues ranging from water quality to climate change.
Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, said progressive issues could be "at risk, simply if an individual business owner doesn't like it."
Under the bill, plaintiffs who successfully challenge ordinances in court could receive up to $50,000 in attorney fees and costs.
The bill was supported by groups such as the Florida Chamber of Commerce, Associated Industries of Florida, the Florida Retail Federation, the Florida Home Builders Association, Florida Realtors, the Florida Restaurant & Lodging Association, the Florida League of Cities and the Florida Association of Counties.
DeSantis vetoed a somewhat-similar measure last year, saying it needed to be more targeted.
The 2022 proposal would have allowed businesses to sue cities and counties if ordinances caused at least 15% losses of profits. In a veto letter, DeSantis took issue with the bill being "broad and ambiguous," which he said could result in "unintended and unforeseen consequences and costly litigation."
Jim Turner reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All43 States Reach $700 Million Settlement With J&J in Talc Product Lawsuits
Attorneys Probing 'Every Potential Avenue' Over Norfolk Southern Accident
6 minute readFederal Judge Rejects Plaintiffs' Expert Causation Testimony in BP Oil Spill Cleanup Suit
Trending Stories
- 1Trump’s DOE Pick Could Spell Trouble for Title IX Enforcement, Higher Ed Funding
- 2Jefferson Doctor Hit With $6.8M Verdict Over Death of 64-Year-Old Cancer Patient
- 3Seven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 1
- 4What Went Wrong With Adeel Mangi's Long, Strange Trip Through the Judicial Nomination Process?
- 5Defense Counsel Turns $2.2 Million Broward Jury Verdict to $500K
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250