Florida Lawmakers Are Now Pushing Circuit Court Consolidation
Under the state Constitution, the Supreme Court can "certify" recommendations to the Legislature about a need to decrease or redefine judicial circuits. The Legislature then would make a decision.
July 12, 2023 at 12:08 PM
3 minute read
After Florida lawmakers in 2022 reorganized the state's appeals courts, House Speaker Paul Renner, R-Palm Coast, is pushing to consolidate circuit courts.
A committee appointed by Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Carlos Muniz will hold its first meeting Friday to begin looking at consolidation in the 20-circuit system. Muniz issued an order June 30 appointing the committee after receiving a request from Renner.
"Although Florida's appellate districts have recently been realigned, the boundaries of Florida's judicial circuits have been unchanged for decades despite significant population and demographic changes during that timeframe," Renner wrote in a June 15 letter to Muniz. "The size of our judicial circuits varies widely, ranging from approximately 2.7 million people [in the Eleventh Circuit] to less than 100,000 people [in the Sixteenth Circuit]. I believe that the consolidation of circuits might lead to greater efficiencies and uniformity in the judicial process, thereby increasing public trust and confidence. I also believe that the consolidation of circuits would result in improved economies of scale in the judiciary's back-office operations, leading to substantial cost savings for Florida's taxpayers."
In the June 30 order, Muniz said current boundaries of judicial circuits have been in place since 1969.
"Without expressing any view on the merits at this time, the [Supreme] Court agrees that the question of whether there is a need to consolidate Florida's judicial circuits deserves thoughtful consideration and careful study," Muniz wrote. "To that end, and to aid the [Supreme] Court in making its ultimate determination, the [Supreme] Court believes it would be beneficial to appoint an assessment committee."
Under the state Constitution, the Supreme Court can "certify" recommendations to the Legislature about a need to decrease or redefine judicial circuits. The Legislature then would make a decision.
Renner's letter referred to the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, which is made up of Miami-Dade County, and the Sixteenth Judicial Circuit, which is made up of Monroe County. Three other circuits are made up of one county each—Broward, Hillsborough and Palm Beach.
By contrast, the Third Judicial Circuit is made up of seven rural North Florida counties—Columbia, Dixie, Hamilton, Lafayette, Madison, Suwannee and Taylor. The Second Judicial Circuit, the Eighth Judicial Circuit and the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit, which are spread across other parts of North Florida, each have six counties.
After decades of having five district courts of appeal, lawmakers last year approved creating a Sixth District Court of Appeal. That change, which took effect Jan. 1, also involved revising the jurisdictions of the First District Court of Appeal, the Second District Court of Appeal and the Fifth District Court of Appeal. In some cases, judges had to change districts.
Circuits also have their own judges, state attorneys and public defenders. In his June 30 order, Muniz said the newly formed committee "must limit its findings and recommendations to whether there is a need to consolidate [i.e., reduce the number of] Florida's judicial circuits."
The 14-member committee, made up of judges, clerks and attorneys, will be chaired by Fourth District Court of Appeal Judge Jonathan Gerber. Muniz asked the committee to submit recommendations by Dec. 1, a little more than a month before the 2024 legislative session starts.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readAs Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250