Florida Lawmakers Are Now Pushing Circuit Court Consolidation
Under the state Constitution, the Supreme Court can "certify" recommendations to the Legislature about a need to decrease or redefine judicial circuits. The Legislature then would make a decision.
July 12, 2023 at 12:08 PM
3 minute read
After Florida lawmakers in 2022 reorganized the state's appeals courts, House Speaker Paul Renner, R-Palm Coast, is pushing to consolidate circuit courts.
A committee appointed by Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Carlos Muniz will hold its first meeting Friday to begin looking at consolidation in the 20-circuit system. Muniz issued an order June 30 appointing the committee after receiving a request from Renner.
"Although Florida's appellate districts have recently been realigned, the boundaries of Florida's judicial circuits have been unchanged for decades despite significant population and demographic changes during that timeframe," Renner wrote in a June 15 letter to Muniz. "The size of our judicial circuits varies widely, ranging from approximately 2.7 million people [in the Eleventh Circuit] to less than 100,000 people [in the Sixteenth Circuit]. I believe that the consolidation of circuits might lead to greater efficiencies and uniformity in the judicial process, thereby increasing public trust and confidence. I also believe that the consolidation of circuits would result in improved economies of scale in the judiciary's back-office operations, leading to substantial cost savings for Florida's taxpayers."
In the June 30 order, Muniz said current boundaries of judicial circuits have been in place since 1969.
"Without expressing any view on the merits at this time, the [Supreme] Court agrees that the question of whether there is a need to consolidate Florida's judicial circuits deserves thoughtful consideration and careful study," Muniz wrote. "To that end, and to aid the [Supreme] Court in making its ultimate determination, the [Supreme] Court believes it would be beneficial to appoint an assessment committee."
Under the state Constitution, the Supreme Court can "certify" recommendations to the Legislature about a need to decrease or redefine judicial circuits. The Legislature then would make a decision.
Renner's letter referred to the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, which is made up of Miami-Dade County, and the Sixteenth Judicial Circuit, which is made up of Monroe County. Three other circuits are made up of one county each—Broward, Hillsborough and Palm Beach.
By contrast, the Third Judicial Circuit is made up of seven rural North Florida counties—Columbia, Dixie, Hamilton, Lafayette, Madison, Suwannee and Taylor. The Second Judicial Circuit, the Eighth Judicial Circuit and the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit, which are spread across other parts of North Florida, each have six counties.
After decades of having five district courts of appeal, lawmakers last year approved creating a Sixth District Court of Appeal. That change, which took effect Jan. 1, also involved revising the jurisdictions of the First District Court of Appeal, the Second District Court of Appeal and the Fifth District Court of Appeal. In some cases, judges had to change districts.
Circuits also have their own judges, state attorneys and public defenders. In his June 30 order, Muniz said the newly formed committee "must limit its findings and recommendations to whether there is a need to consolidate [i.e., reduce the number of] Florida's judicial circuits."
The 14-member committee, made up of judges, clerks and attorneys, will be chaired by Fourth District Court of Appeal Judge Jonathan Gerber. Muniz asked the committee to submit recommendations by Dec. 1, a little more than a month before the 2024 legislative session starts.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Firm Reaches $1.9M Settlement for Protester's Injuries, Pursues Class Action for Others
COVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250