Administrative Law Judge Backs PGA Tour in COVID Job Dispute
Teryn Gregson argued that the golf tour's testing and mask requirements violated her religious beliefs and that she suffered "discrimination on the basis of religion" in the November 2021 firing.
July 21, 2023 at 01:26 PM
3 minute read
An administrative law judge rejected allegations that the PGA Tour improperly fired a former reporter and producer who objected to required COVID-19 testing and mask-wearing.
Teryn Gregson argued that the golf tour's testing and mask requirements violated her religious beliefs and that she suffered "discrimination on the basis of religion" in the November 2021 firing, according to a document filed last month by her attorney. The tour required testing and masking for employees, such as Gregson, who declined to be vaccinated.
But Judge James H. Peterson III issued an 18-page recommended order Wednesday that urged dismissal of the case.
"The ultimate reason for petitioner's (Gregson's) termination was her violation of mandatory company health and safety policies that applied to employees regardless of religious background," Peterson wrote. "Petitioner repeatedly refused to comply with PGA Tour's mandatory masking and testing protocols applicable to all unvaccinated employees. That reason was a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason supporting her termination."
Under administrative law, Peterson's recommendation will go to the Florida Commission on Human Relations for a final decision.
Gregson, whose firing received national media attention, was an on-air reporter and producer for PGA Tour Entertainment, based in St. Augustine. The job included traveling to tournaments to interview players and taking part in daily and weekly shows distributed on the tour's website and social media, according to Peterson's ruling.
After COVID-19 hit the United States in March 2020, the tour shut down tournaments and employees worked remotely. After tournaments resumed, the tour established employee requirements such as regular testing and masking, Peterson wrote.
In August 2021, in anticipation of a return to in-person work, employees were asked to provide information to the tour's human-resources department about whether they were vaccinated. Unvaccinated employees faced requirements such as indoor masking and weekly testing, according to the ruling.
Gregson notified the human-resources department in October 2021 that the protocols violated her religious beliefs and requested to be exempted or to be able to work remotely, Peterson wrote. Ultimately, Gregson and the tour could not reach an agreement, and she was fired.
The case, filed at the Commission on Human Relations, alleged the tour violated state and federal laws by not providing religious accommodations.
"The petitioner held, and continues to hold sincere religious beliefs precluding her from receiving any available COVID-19 vaccine, testing for COVID-19 when she does not show signs of illness, and covering her face with a mask," Gregson's attorney wrote in the document filed last month at the state Division of Administrative Hearings. "She informed the tour of her sincerely held religious beliefs regarding vaccination, testing and masking on numerous occasions."
But Peterson wrote that Gregson "did not present enough evidence to show a prima facie case of unlawful discrimination based on religion."
"In sum, petitioner did not demonstrate with credible evidence that the reason asserted by respondent for petitioner's termination — her violation of mandatory health and safety protocols — was mere pretext for unlawful discrimination," he wrote.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 2'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 3Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 4Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 5Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250