New Disney District Board Eyes Lower Tax Rate as Feud Continues
One area targeted for a reduction is overtime pay for law enforcement on Walt Disney properties, which reportedly came to $8 million a year.
July 27, 2023 at 02:36 PM
3 minute read
As a feud continues between Gov. Ron DeSantis and The Walt Disney Co., property owners in a special district that includes Walt Disney World could see a reduction in their property-tax rate.
Martin Garcia, chairman of the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District Board of Supervisors, credited staff members Wednesday with cutting "wasteful spending" by the former Reedy Creek Improvement District board, which was effectively controlled by Disney.
"As we are doing more work, it appears that there are a number of other naughty things that this old board did with district funds," Garcia said. "And so, we're going to look for further savings."
One area targeted for a reduction is overtime pay for law enforcement on Disney properties. Garcia said the tab for that pay came to $8 million a year.
"Now, Disney is not the only taxpayer in this district. We have other taxpayers," Garcia said.
District Administrator Glenton Gilzean said public safety will remain a priority.
The district includes 25,000 acres in Orange and Osceola counties used by Walt Disney World, along with utilities, roads and the cities of Bay Lake and Lake Buena Vista.
The state in the 1960s created the Reedy Creek district for Disney. But DeSantis and Disney have been locked in a battle since the company opposed a 2022 state law that restricted instruction about gender identity and sexual orientation in Florida schools.
DeSantis and Republican lawmakers this year replaced the Reedy Creek Improvement District with the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District and put it under more state control. Among the changes, DeSantis was given the power to appoint members of the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District board.
Disney filed a federal lawsuit this spring that, in part, accuses the state of retaliation for the company's opposition to the 2022 law. The district countered by filing a state lawsuit over development agreements that Disney and the former Reedy Creek board signed shortly before the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District board took over.
The Legislature and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District board have also taken steps to invalidate the development agreements.
The district will hold budget hearings in September to finalize a spending plan and tax rate.
The Board on Wednesday tentatively set a tax rate of 12.95 mills for the fiscal year that will start Oct. 1, down from 13.9 mills in the current year. Millage represents the dollars assessed for each $1,000 of value.
For the owner of a $500,000 nonhomesteaded home that didn't change in value over the past year, the proposed rate would drop property taxes from about $6,950 to $6,475.
Property-tax revenue is expected to cover $188.4 million of the district's costs next fiscal year, up from $183 million budgeted for the current year. Permits and fees are expected to generate another $5 million for the district, up from $3.25 million in the current fiscal year.
The district anticipates $198.7 million in expenses next fiscal year, covering costs such as employees and debt. The total is up from $185.86 million in the current year.
The cost of labor is expected to grow from $56.34 million in the current year to $67.1 million.
The board on Wednesday backed a three-year agreement with the Reedy Creek Professional Firefighters' Association IAFF Local 2117 that in part will bump minimum pay from $55,000 a year to $65,000.
Jim Turner reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Year-End Tax Planning: How Real Estate Investors Can Leverage Qualified Opportunity Funds
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250