Corporate Transparency Act: Where We Are and What Is to Come
With three short months left before the CTA is set to go into effect, existing reporting companies should begin making plans on assembling their reports and possibly seeking guidance from their legal advisers.
October 23, 2023 at 12:53 PM
4 minute read
Fabio Giallanza of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole + Bierman. Courtesy photo
Overview
The Corporate Transparency Act (the CTA, Title LXIV of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021) was enacted in 2021 in an effort to prevent the use of U.S. business entities for illicit purposes. The CTA notably introduced the requirement that reporting companies disclose their beneficial owner information (BOI), part of a growing international trend toward corporate transparency and accountability. According to the U.S. Department of Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the CTA will officially come into effect on Jan. 1, 2024, requiring reporting companies, such as corporations and limited liability companies, to submit reports including the identities of their beneficial owners.
Where We Are
With three short months left before the CTA is set to go into effect, existing reporting companies should begin making plans on assembling their reports and possibly seeking guidance from their legal advisers. For companies formed prior to 2024, reporting is currently due one year from the effective date, or by Jan. 1, 2025. However, FinCEN recently proposed a regulation to extend the deadline for companies created after Jan. 1, 2024, and before Jan. 1, 2025. This extension would give those new corporations 90 days (originally 30 days) to submit their initial BOI reports. This proposed extension is meant to give these newly formed corporations time to understand the filing obligations and compile the documents necessary to meet the filing requirements. Please note, however, that companies formed on or after Jan. 1, 2025 will need to adhere to the original 30-day time frame.
For guidance, FinCEN recently released a small entity compliance guide (guide) in September that clarifies various points such as which companies are considered "reporting companies;" which companies are exempt from reporting. Currently, there are 23 types of entities that are exempt from reporting; (For example, banks, credit unions, and tax-exempt entities. See the Small Entity Compliance Guide to view the full list); who exactly qualifies as a beneficial owner; which companies are also required to report their company applicants; and what would happen if a company previously reported inaccurate information. Reporting companies are also responsible for updating and correcting information previously filed. The guide provides a comprehensive step-by-step approach to the CTA's reporting requirements and provides useful visuals answering a wide array of commonly asked questions. Moreover, as of Sept. 29, FinCEN updated its FAQs to address crucial questions, such as how to report through multiple exempt entities, how companies can request their FinCEN identification numbers (although this is not a requirement), how companies should report when unaffiliated companies provide services to a reporting company, and how third-party professional services to reporting companies will not be considered BOIs unless the individuals in question are not regarded as senior officers with substantial control.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/cc/43/b38dd9c34388b0bf5f2a720c8c65/brian-tannenbaum-767x633.jpg)
Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
5 minute read![SEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration SEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4c/fb/ea229c724a0a98c1858b6112649f/silver-chase-767x633-1.jpg)
SEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
6 minute read![Turning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being Turning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailybusinessreview/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/04/Rebecca-Palmer-767x633-2.jpg)
Turning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being
5 minute read![Four Things to Know About Florida’s New Law to Protect Minors Online Four Things to Know About Florida’s New Law to Protect Minors Online](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/ac/5a/3196ba1c42a48ab3c0259cfcce88/hartsfield-martinez-767x633.jpg)
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250