Credit: Pixel-Shot/Adobe Stock State High Court Refuses to Suspend Seminole Sports Betting
The Florida Supreme Court denied a motion by West Flagler Associates and Bonita-Fort Myers Corp. to "immediately suspend the sports betting provisions" of a law that carried out a 2021 gambling deal between the Seminole Tribe and the state.
November 20, 2023 at 01:47 PM
3 minute read
Cases and Courts
The Florida Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request by two pari-mutuel companies to halt online sports betting offered by the Seminole Tribe while a broader legal battle plays out.
Without explanation, the Supreme Court denied a motion by West Flagler Associates and Bonita-Fort Myers Corp. to "immediately suspend the sports betting provisions" of a law that carried out a 2021 gambling deal between the tribe and the state.
The deal, known as a compact, allowed the tribe to offer online sports betting to people throughout the state.
But the pari-mutuel companies filed a petition in September at the Supreme Court contending that the sports-betting part of the compact and the accompanying law violate a 2018 constitutional amendment requiring voter approval of casino gambling.
With the case pending, the tribe on Nov. 7 relaunched a sports-betting app. Attorneys for West Flagler Associates and Bonita-Fort Myers Corp. quickly asked the Supreme Court to suspend the sports betting part of the law.
"This exigency has been created by the launch of the Seminole Tribe's mobile betting application on November 7, 2023, without prior warning," the attorneys wrote in a 15-page motion.
While the Supreme Court on Friday denied the suspension request, its decision did not resolve the underlying legal issues in the case.
The 2021 deal, which was signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis and Seminole Tribe of Florida Chairman Marcellus Osceola Jr. and ratified by the Legislature, also allowed the Seminoles to add craps and roulette to their Florida casinos and add three casinos on tribal property in Broward County. In exchange, the tribe agreed to pay the state at least $2.5 billion over the first five years and possibly billions of dollars more over the course of the pact,
The tribe in 2021 briefly launched an app to allow sports wagering throughout the state, but the app was shut down amid a federal lawsuit filed by the pari-mutuel companies. The U.S. Supreme Court last month refused to block the deal in that lawsuit, which is separate from the Florida Supreme Court case.
After the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, the tribe announced Nov. 1 that it would begin allowing sports betting at its casinos in December. It went further Nov. 7 by saying it would also take online sports bets from a limited group of gamblers.
At least in part, it made access available to people who used the 2021 app or who had points from the tribe's "Unity by Hard Rock" loyalty program for casino gamblers.
The focus of the legal fight is part of the deal aimed at allowing gamblers to place mobile sports wagers anywhere in the state, with bets handled by computer servers on tribal property. The deal said bets "using a mobile app or other electronic device, shall be deemed to be exclusively conducted by the tribe."
The opponents contend that allowing people off tribal properties to place sports bets would violate the 2018 constitutional amendment requiring voter approval of casino gambling.
West Flagler holds three jai alai licenses, while Bonita-Fort Myers Corp. does business as Bonita Springs Poker Room in Southwest Florida. They contend they could be hurt financially if the tribe is able to offer online sports betting statewide.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Special Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute read
North Carolina Courts Switch to Digital, Face Extreme Weather in 2024
'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute read
Divided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'David and Goliath' Dispute Between Software Developers Ends in $24M Settlement
- 2Supreme Court Takes Up the Corporate Transparency Act: Recent Litigation and Potential Next Steps
- 3Brogdon: The Final Nail in Corbin’s Coffin in Premises Cases
- 4What to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development
- 5'Quiet, Appropriate End:' NY Court of Appeals Formally Removes Erin Gall From Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
