State Lawmakers Seek Study on Impact of Electric Vehicles
Bills filed in the House and Senate called for imposing a registration fee on electric vehicles to make up for lost gas-tax revenue, which is used for transportation projects.
December 08, 2023 at 02:39 PM
4 minute read
AutomotiveWith concerns raised about a proposed annual registration fee on electric vehicles amounting to a "double tax," House members want a study about impacts of the increased number of electric vehicles on Florida roads.
Bills filed in the House and Senate called for imposing a registration fee on electric vehicles to make up for lost gas-tax revenue, which is used for transportation projects.
But the House Transportation & Modals Subcommittee on Thursday scaled back the House bill (HB 107) to direct state economists to review the long-term infrastructure effects of electric vehicles and hybrid vehicles.
"It seems like a lot of us agree that we don't want to jump ahead when it comes to applying some sort of fee or tax to EV drivers without doing the research first," Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, said.
Under the revised bill, lawmakers would be expected in 2026 to consider potential changes to address the anticipated decline in gas-tax revenue as more electric and hybrid vehicles go on the road.
"We need a solution, because while we see the innovation coming into the transportation market, that doesn't mean that we don't need to continue to fund our infrastructure," bill sponsor Tiffany Esposito, R-Fort Myers, said.
The revised version of the bill also would direct that an existing 4.35% tax imposed at charging stations go to road maintenance through the Transportation Trust Fund, which funds the Department of Transportation's five-year work plan, rather than to state general revenue.
Esposito said the review, which would be conducted by the state Revenue Estimating Conference, also would consider federal policy changes and financial impacts of charging electric vehicles at private residences. A report would be due Sept. 1, 2025.
"Most of our EVs are being charged at home. And that is part of this debate," Esposito said.
The House revision came a day after the Senate Transportation Committee approved a bill (SB 28) that called for electric-vehicle owners to pay an annual registration fee of $200.
State economists have projected registration fees would generate $65 million a year, covering what is expected to be lost in gas taxes by 2030.
"That kind of recurring revenue deficit is devastating. If we have that kind of loss, the Port of Miami tunnel wouldn't have been built," Esposito said. "We cannot continue to build and have world-class infrastructure if we cannot fund it."
Senate bill sponsor Ed Hooper, R-Clearwater, called his proposal an issue of "fairness" for everyone who uses the state's road system. He said the fee structure would be based on figures from the Electric Drive Transportation Association.
The association projects motorists who drive 10,000 miles a year pay about $190 a year in federal, state and local gas taxes. For those who drive 12,000 miles a year, the combined taxes come to about $228 a year.
While the Senate Transportation Committee supported Hooper's bill, concerns were raised by lawmakers and a Tesla lobbyist that the proposed fee could result in electric-vehicle owners being "double taxed" through the fee and taxes imposed at charging stations.
In backing the changes to Esposito's bill, Tesla lobbyist Jeff Sharkey said the company is expected to pay $2.5 million to $3 million in taxes through its charging stations this year. "The amendment is really a fair and responsible way to move forward," Sharkey said.
As of Dec. 31, 2022, Florida had 167,990 registered electric vehicles, up from 95,640 a year earlier. The Florida Department of Transportation's 2021 EV Infrastructure Master Plan found the use of electric vehicles could result in a 5.6% to 20% drop in "motor-fuel based revenue streams" by 2040.
Because Esposito's amendment substantially changed the bill, the House panel will have to reconsider the proposal at a future meeting, Chairwoman Fiona McFarland, R-Sarasota, said.
Jim Turner reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecurities Claims Against Lilium N.V. for Electric Plane Production Delays Fail to Take Flight, Federal Judge Holds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
- 2The Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
- 3November Court of Appeals Roundup
- 4Trellis Launches Trellis AI, a New Suite of Automated Litigation Tools
- 5How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250