Conservative Law Firm Wins for Hialeah Mayor in Dispute With Attorney
The client is a Republican mayor. The opponent, who is also an attorney with Podhurst Orseck, is listed as nonpartisan.
January 26, 2024 at 01:39 PM
4 minute read
A Hialeah City Council member took his municipal grievances to Miami court, and the court spoke on whether his complaint was valid.
Miami-Dade Circuit Court Judge Reemberto Diaz, in the court's civil division, dismissed the claims by plaintiff Bryan Calvo, one of seven councilmembers for the City of Hialeah.
Calvo sued Hialeah Mayor Esteban Bovo Jr., claiming Bovo's policies are unlawful and violate plaintiff's rights as council member under the Hialeah City Charter and Code of Ordinances.
"The court is without jurisdiction to interfere in the internal legislative decision-making of Hialeah's City Council," Diaz ruled. "For this and the reasons set forth … plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice."
Ryan C. Tyler of Untiedt Dabdoub & Tyler, Coral Gables, represented Calvo. He was disappointed with the result.
"The ruling was obviously not what we hoped for or expected. As such, we are exploring all options for an appeal," Tyler said.
Bovo's attorney, Jesus M. Suarez, co-founder of Continental PLLC Attorneys-at-Law, said he was pleased with the outcome.
"Calvo was trying to litigate what he can't legislate for his policy initiatives, and he asked to impose his will on his colleagues," Suarez said.
The attorney said that public trust is at hand whenever a firm represents a municipality, or in this case, a mayor who was elected in 2021 to serve a four-year term.
"In our case, we understand that Hialeah is a hard-working city and that it needs to be spending its tax dollars on serving its citizens—and not on litigation," Suarez said.
Suarez's 20-lawyer firm deals in complex legal, political and business environments in Miami, Tallahassee, and Washington, D.C.
Suarez and his team also recently represented former President Donald Trump in his three-month Manhattan trial against New York State Attorney General Leticia James.
"We have a reputation for representing center-right politicians and taking on hard cases," Suarez said.
Suarez's client in this case, Bovo, is a Republican mayor. The opponent, Calvo, who is also an attorney with Podhurst Orseck, is listed as nonpartisan.
In a previous interview with the Daily Business Review, Suarez said, "Big Law has been impacted by 'cancel culture.' They can't represent anyone who has been canceled by the 'wokesters.' We think that's wrong and we're happy to take on those representations."
|Related Story: As Donald Trump's Legal Troubles Mount, Here's Who is Representing Him in His Classified Documents Case Out of Florida
Calvo had claimed Bovo's policies were unlawful and violated plaintiff's rights as a council member under the Hialeah City Charter and Code of Ordinances.
"Plaintiff claims he has been frustrated in his ability to investigate, inquire and raise issues at City Council meetings by Mayor Bovo's administrative policies," court documents read.
However, the complaint claims the plaintiff has extensively exercised his duties as a council member but has been constrained by the legislative prerogatives of his colleagues on the City Council.
Time was of the essence, Suarez said.
"When you represent a local municipality, you have to make sure that everything you do is in the best interest of the taxpayers. We have to make sure that we work as efficiently as possible to bring about a quick resolution so that the city can focus on what it needs to do and not engage in unnecessary litigation," the mayor's attorney said.
Diaz, the judge wrote, "Nothing in the complaint alleges how the challenged policies prevent plaintiff from fulfilling his obligations or that 'irreparable injury' would result without the injunction. He merely alleges that the Memoranda prevent him from proceeding in a manner not authorized by the Charter or Code."
Diaz said Calvo did not question the validity of the Charter or the Code, which governs the conduct of Hialeah's municipal affairs.
"As a result, it is impossible for plaintiff to suffer any harm resulting from the Memoranda," the judge wrote. "In any event, enjoining enforcement of the Memoranda will not give plaintiff the relief he seeks because the Charter and the Code, not the Memoranda, govern the conduct of municipal affairs."
|Read the Ruling Here
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllZero-Dollar Verdict: Which of Florida's Largest Firms Lost?
Trump's Lawyers Speak Out: 'The President Had the Confidence to Retain Me'
Florida Supreme Court Clarifies Qualifications for Court-Appointed Arbitrators
3 minute readUS Bankruptcy Filings Rise 16.2% as Interest Rates, Inflation, and End of COVID Relief Hit Hard
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250