Not So Fast, Additional Clarity for Condo Termination Provisions
As legislative and market forces converge to make condominium termination an attractive alternative to reserve funding requirements, additional clarity concerning the interpretation of condominium termination provisions is essential.
April 23, 2024 at 09:09 AM
4 minute read
Board of ContributorsThe South Florida skyline is aging, and since the tragic collapse of Champlain Towers South, the state Legislature has rightfully prioritized reform of Florida statutes governing condominiums. Two-thirds of all condominiums in Florida are more than 30 years old, and may be reaching the end of their useful lives, particularly in harsh coastal areas. As now-mandatory structural integrity reserve studies are completed and previously waived reserves for capital expenses and deferred maintenance are required and assessed, condominium termination will become an increasingly attractive solution to owners in aging condominiums, with the added benefit of promoting new, more resilient development. To leverage the benefits of this unique environment, clarity concerning the circumstances in which amendments to Florida's Condominium Act will apply to free condominium owners of strict termination provisions in their governing documents is essential. As the recent Biscayne 21 decision from the Third District Court of Appeal confirms, if the Legislature fails to comprehensively address the issue, courts will do so on a case-by-case basis.
Florida's statutory scheme governing condominiums is undergoing legislative reform. Under Senate Bill 4D, adopted during the 2022 Legislative session (and further revised in 2023), residential condominiums with three or more stories must complete a structural integrity reserve study (SIRS) by Dec. 31, 2024. By law, a SIRS must involve a visual inspection of specified structural components of the condominium property, as well as an estimate of the remaining useful life and the cost to replace or maintain each component inspected, and a reserve funding schedule that will timely achieve the identified replacement costs or deferred maintenance expenses. Further, for budgets adopted on or after Dec. 31, 2024, unit owners are no longer permitted to waive the collection of reserves or insufficient reserves for the structural components inspected during the performance of the SIRS.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
5 minute readSEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
6 minute readTurning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250