Sex, AI and CSAM—Is a Reckoning Coming for Social Media Platforms?
We cannot afford to allow Big Tech to promote, advertise, publish, create, encourage, profit from, and perpetuate the online exploitation of children. As April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month, it is now time to address this ongoing disaster.
April 24, 2024 at 09:32 AM
6 minute read
Sexually generative artificial intelligence (AI) and child sexual abuse material (CSAM) stand as harrowing reminders of the dark underbelly of technological advancement and social media expansion. Despite the rise of sexual exploitation on social media platforms such as Meta, TikTok, X, Discord and Snap, Big Tech attempts to evade accountability under the alleged protection of 47 USC Section 230. However, the time for complacency has passed. Urgent action is imperative to curb this epidemic. We cannot afford to allow Big Tech to promote, advertise, publish, create, encourage, profit from, and perpetuate the online exploitation of children. As April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month, it is now time to address this ongoing disaster.
According to the U.S. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), CSAM is the sexual abuse and exploitation of children through images and videos. CSAM is a particularly heinous and egregious form of child pornography because the child victims suffer re-victimization each time the image of their sexual abuse is viewed. This affects both young girls and young boys. According to NCMEC, "Prepubescent children are at greatest risk to be depicted in CSAM. When boys are victimized, they are much more likely than girls to be subjected to very explicit or egregious abuse. On average boys depicted on CSAM are younger than girls and more likely to have not yet reached puberty. 78% of reports regarding online enticement involved girls and 15% involved boys."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Black Box Evidence is Bulletproof': South Florida Attorneys Obtain $1 Million Settlement
2 minute read'All About Case Selection': Small But Mighty Miami Firm Reflects on Decades of Success
Miami Firm Reaches $1.9M Settlement for Protester's Injuries, Pursues Class Action for Others
Trending Stories
- 1AIAs: A Look At the Future of AI-Related Contracts
- 2Litigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Linklaters Hires Four Partners From Patterson Belknap
- 5Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250