Manuel Garcia-Linares, left, and Georgia Thompson, right, of Day Pitney. Courtesy photos Beyond Salary: Considerations for Law Students Selecting Their First Law Firm
While salary is of course an important factor, the impact of this choice extends beyond financial considerations. In selecting a law firm where they can build and grow a successful career, law students must be mindful to consider additional important factors such as a firm's culture, opportunities for mentorship, access to hands-on experience, work-life balance, and areas of practice.
September 06, 2024 at 09:53 AM
7 minute read
Board of Contributors
For law students and recent law school graduates, selecting their first law firm is particularly critical as it can greatly influence their career trajectory. While salary is of course an important factor, the impact of this choice extends beyond financial considerations. In selecting a law firm where they can build and grow a successful career, law students must be mindful to consider additional important factors such as a firm's culture, opportunities for mentorship, access to hands-on experience, work-life balance, and areas of practice. Ultimately, the ideal law firm should offer more than just a competitive salary. It should offer the total package, including providing an enriching environment that supports professional development and aligns with the attorney's long-term career aspirations. Here are some key factors to consider when selecting a firm.
A Law Firm's Culture
It is important to inquire about a law firm's culture to understand how the firm fosters a sense of community. For instance, at Day Pitney, we organize happy hours, group outings and volunteer opportunities. It is also important to recognize that a firm's culture encompasses more than just social events and team-building activities. To truly understand a firm's intangible culture, a new attorney should consider the following factors:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
5 minute read
SEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
6 minute read
Turning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being
5 minute read
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Pistachio Giant Wonderful Files Trademark Suit Against Canadian Maker of Wonderspread
- 2New York State Authorizes Stand-Alone Business Interruption Insurance Policies
- 3Buyer Beware: Continuity of Coverage in Legal Malpractice Insurance
- 4‘Listen, Listen, Listen’: Some Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 5BCLP Joins Saudi Legal Market with Plans to Open Two Offices
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
