Morgan & Morgan billboard in Islamorada, Florida. Courtesy photo Morgan & Morgan Sues Law Firm, Managing Partner for Violating Settlement Over Misleading Ads
"Whether you're a well-known divorce firm or a well-known criminal firm, it's very likely that your competitors are buying your name and trying to put up ads that will direct people looking for you to someone else, oftentimes in a very deceptive way," the plaintiff's counsel said.
September 24, 2024 at 04:41 PM
3 minute read
What You Need to Know
- Morgan & Morgan is suing the Morgan Law Group for allegedly breaching a 2020 settlement agreement.
- The nation's largest personal injury firm that MLG used deceptive advertisements that mislead potential clients.
- The case highlights the potential risks of competitors using misleading Google Ads to divert clients.
Morgan & Morgan sued the Morgan Law Group and Thomas Jeremiah Morgan in the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit.
The nation's largest personal injury firm claims that the defendants breached their settlement agreement and, according to the suit, engaged in the "continued use of misleading and deceptive advertisements that are intentionally designed to confuse and mislead the public into believing they are contacting Morgan & Morgan for legal representation, when they are actually being directed to MLG."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Local Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
3 minute read
Plaintiffs Allege Carollo Retaliated Over Bayfront Trust Accounting Discoveries
3 minute read
Tragedy on I-95: Florida Lawsuit Against Horizon Freight System Could Set New Precedent in Crash Cases
2 minute read
'You Lied to the Jury': Veteran Awarded $5 Million in Defamation Case Against CNN
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
- 2Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
- 3Long Hours and Lack Of Boundaries: Associates In India Are Leaving Their Firms
- 4Goodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
- 5'Didn't Notice Patient Wasn't Breathing': $13.7M Verdict Against Anesthesiologists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
