Rising Tide of Litigation: Navigating the Growing Legal Challenges Against State Cannabis Programs and Its Impact
With a projected market of $112.4 billion by the end of 2024—a roughly 12% increase in sales from the following year, it is no surprise operators will take every measure to obtain a coveted license in the cannabis industry, even if that means taking it to the courts.
September 24, 2024 at 10:30 AM
8 minute read
Board of ContributorsFrom the Gulf Coast of the Alabama shoreline to the evergreen forests of Washington, no state has been safe from the uptake in litigation that hones in on the pitfalls and loopholes of a state-approved cannabis program. With a projected market of $112.4 billion by the end of 2024—a roughly 12% increase in sales from the following year, it is no surprise operators will take every measure to obtain a coveted license in the cannabis industry, even if that means taking it to the courts. See Andrew Long, "MJBiz Factbook: Marijuana Industry Will Add $112.4 Billion to US Economy in 2024," MJBiz Daily (Apr. 27, 2024). However, legal challenges to states' cannabis programs have had detrimental impacts on the public's access to cannabis once it's approved, especially for qualified patients. See Brendan Kirby, Three Years After Medical Marijuana Passed, Alabama Patients Still Waiting, FOX10 News (July 25, 2024). So, where is the middle ground between regulators and prospective operators?
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Florida Property Insurance Claims in a Post-Fee-Shifting World
5 minute readThe Eleventh Circuit Will Hear The IMC Petition on the FCC’s One-to-One Consent Rule
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Tech Startups That Google-backed Venture Firms Invested in Throughout 2024
- 2Pre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
- 3Benjamin West and John Singleton Copley: American Painters in London
- 4I Aim to Make a Positive Change in Everyday Interactions, Tracey Wishert Says
- 5Connecticut Is Updating its Environmental Justice Regulations
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250