Helene, Milton Leave Behind Tangle of Insurance Disputes, Litigators Say
November 13, 2024 at 04:24 PM
3 minute read
Insurance LitigationAs the southeastern United States has begun to rebuild after hurricanes Helene and Milton tore through parts of the country, many different forms of litigation are expected to follow.
Experts in insurance, construction and real estate weighed in on what to expect.
"There are a wide variety of potential claims with respect to a hurricane, including what caused the loss," said Steven Brodie, a Miami-based shareholder with Carlton Fields whose area of focus is insurance. "Was it wind? Was it water? As for business interruption claims, was the damage caused by a pre-existing defect, or was it caused by the event? ... To what extent does (damaged property) have to be replaced? Does it have to be brought up to code?"
For those who sustained damage from both Helene and Milton, they and their insurance companies will have to determine whether "each event caused separate damage or not," Brodie said.
For example, if a property owner has a coverage limit of $20 million per event, that owner might not necessarily receive $20 million for each event, he said. The owner would have to prove that the second hurricane caused separate and distinct damage from the first.
"I think that's going to be one of the big challenges here: both the insured and insurers trying to determine whether there was distinct damage caused by each event and whether there would be more than one policy limit available. ... The issue is, how do you best show that?" he said.
Jason Quintero, a shareholder with Carlton Fields whose area of focus is construction, said he anticipates that he and fellow attorneys who work in his practice area will primarily see litigation relating to construction projects that have been interrupted and damaged as a result of the hurricanes.
"Most of those claims are covered by its public risk insurance policy, but there is going to be some litigation that comes out of that," Quintero said.
Upcoming construction litigation will likely include disputes over payment, the nature of the insurance coverage, and the terms for contracts' force majeure provisions, Quintero said.
"Depending on how those force majeure provisions are written, a contractor may be exposed to claims because the contract doesn't address it properly, and the owner could press the contractor to meet unreasonable deadlines because the work has been pushed out," Quintero said. "Or, the owner could have issues in terms of obligation to pay, based on what the contract says."
People who own or manage condos should be prepared for potential litigation as well.
After hurricanes, condominium associations can suffer significant damage to common areas. Litigation can arise when the associations retain contractors to repair common areas, but the repairs aren't done correctly or payment disputes arise.
"Probably eight to 10 months out is when we'll start seeing the first beginnings of that litigation start to come in," Quintero said.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBack-To-Back Hurricanes' Impact on Florida Legal Work Will Go Beyond Usual Suspects
5 minute readHurricane Helene Likely To Roil Florida's Already Imperiled Insurance Market
5 minute read$50K Offer Spins Off Into $4.4M Verdict Against Travelers Insurance
Trending Stories
- 1The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
- 2Bosworth Claims It Was Kline & Specter, Not Him, That Breached Settlement Terms
- 3K&L Gates Faces Malpractice Suit: 'An Experienced Labor Attorney Would Know'
- 4Announcing Women Attorneys of the Year 2024
- 5Judge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250