Divorce Timing Is Everything: Waiting for the New Year May Have Its Advantages
Heading toward divorce during the holidays can feel like navigating a snowstorm with no clear road ahead—stressful, overwhelming and full of obstacles. But do not worry; there is a light at the end of the tunnel—it is the fresh start that January can bring. Waiting until the new year to file for divorce might not seem festive, but it could be your favorite gift of the season because the timing of this decision can have significant financial, legal, and emotional impacts.
January 07, 2025 at 02:00 PM
4 minute read
Heading toward divorce during the holidays can feel like navigating a snowstorm with no clear road ahead—stressful, overwhelming and full of obstacles. But do not worry; there is a light at the end of the tunnel—it is the fresh start that January can bring. Waiting until the new year to file for divorce might not seem festive, but it could be your favorite gift of the season because the timing of this decision can have significant financial, legal, and emotional impacts. Here are a few reasons why holding off until January might be the best course of action.
One of the most compelling reasons to delay filing for divorce after Dec. 31 is the impact on an individual’s tax filing status. The IRS determines marital status based on the last day of the calendar year. If a person is still legally married on the last day of the year, taxes can be filed jointly, which often comes with significant tax benefits compared to filing as single or head of household. For example, married couples filing jointly typically qualify for more significant standard deductions, higher income thresholds for certain tax credits, and sometimes more favorable tax brackets. Filing as a single individual or head of household can result in a higher tax burden, mainly if one of the spouses earns substantially more income. Delaying a divorce until January is one way to take advantage of these financial benefits for one final tax year. Beyond taxes, waiting can also provide more time to organize and plan for financial changes. Divorce involves dividing assets and debts as well as often adjusting to significant changes in income, while the holiday season can add financial strain with increased spending on gifts, travel, and celebrations. Postponing the legal process until after the holidays gives valuable time to budget, plan for legal fees, and evaluate the long-term monetary impact of decisions.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250