A national payday lender cannot bar customers with grievances from participating in class action lawsuits by a restrictive arbitration agreement, the 4th District Court of Appeal has ruled.
Affirming a Palm Beach circuit ruling, the court concluded Spartanburg, South Carolina-based McKenzie Check Advance’s contract provision was unconscionable and a violation of public policy because it in essence left customers without a viable legal remedy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
