In a case of first impression, the 5th District Court of Appeal recently decided T.M.H. v. D.M.T. (no. 5D09-3559), addressing “whether two women involved in a lesbian relationship for several years share parental rights and responsibilities to a child born out of that relationship.”
In a lengthy and contentious 2–1 decision, the majority held that both women share parental rights to the child. It reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the birth mother and against the biological mother, declared unconstitutional the statute at the center of the dispute, Florida Statute section 742.14, and certified the following question as a matter of great public importance: Does application of section 742.14 to deprive parental rights to a lesbian woman who provided her ova to her lesbian partner so both women could have a child to raise together as equal parental partners and who did parent the child for several years after its birth render the statute unconstitutional under the Equal Protection and Privacy clauses of the federal and state constitutions?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]