Class action plaintiffs lawyers are still struggling for another bite at Apple after their antitrust claims against Apple and AT&T Mobility foundered on an AT&T arbitration agreement with iPhone customers last year.
In a 26-page brief filed Monday, the lawyers argued that their follow-on suit against only Apple should be allowed to move forward since Apple is just as liable as AT&T for creating an alleged monopoly in the aftermarket for iPhone voice and data services.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
