Who can blame the U.S. Supreme Court for wanting no part of Chevron Corp.’s multibillion-dollar slugfest over its predecessor’s operations in the Ecuadorean Amazon?
The high court steered clear of the toxic litigation over toxic sludge in Lago Agrio, refusing Tuesday to grant certiorari to consider a ruling that limited Chevron’s options for fighting the $18 billion judgment by an Ecuadorean court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
