As a career prosecutor, I had the honor of serving our country for almost 30 years, first as a Judge Advocate in the United States Marine Corps and culminating in six years as the presidentially appointed United States Attorney for the Northern District of Florida.

In 1993, in a case called Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court adopted a tough new standard for the admission of expert scientific evidence in federal courts. Under this modern scientific standard, judges act as "gatekeepers" and are responsible for ensuring that expert opinions presented in court are relevant, reliable and based on sound science.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]