For eight years, video equipment dealer Eileen Garcia and ex-husband Vincent DiRosa lived under the constant threat of a lawsuit by a former business associate.
Then a series of rapid-fire moves by their attorneys dismantled their adversary’s case. They bought an uncollected judgment in an unrelated case to use as leverage and benefited from deposition admissions by the ex-partner, David Haylock. Stripped of critical evidence, he lacked the means to win a trial. The Miami-Dade Circuit case was dismissed Oct. 3, the day it was scheduled for trial.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
