Unfortunately (or fortunately) this article is not about some new exotic fad involving Jacuzzis and Speedos.
We can all breathe a sigh of relief and focus instead on a question that litigators who rely on expert testimony often face: how much of the expert evidence can the trier of fact possibly understand and retain when the expert testimony comes in nonconsecutive pieces and where the time between each piece can go from days to weeks and even months?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
