The political maneuvering leading up to this week’s nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court could set a precedent — possibly a dangerous one, according to legal experts versed in the process.
“We’re seeing norms, informal practices, being shaped on how the vetting process should be handled in the future,” University of North Carolina constitutional law professor Michael Gerhardt said during a panel discussion Wednesday about Supreme Court nominations and confirmations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
