Construction Company Hit With $45M Verdict in Fatal I-75 Crash
Ranger Construction Co. was held liable for a driver who made a U-turn against traffic to get off the I-75 median.
October 27, 2017 at 04:58 PM
3 minute read
A South Florida construction company is on the hook for a $45 million verdict after asking an unsupervised driver to maneuver a tractor-trailer off the Interstate 75 median late at night, leading to a crash that killed two people in other vehicles.
A Broward Circuit Court jury sided with the family of medical student Raymond Astaphan, 29, of Dominica, who was killed when truck driver Juan Calero made a U-turn off the median against four lanes of traffic.
The four-week trial before Judge Michael Robinson ended Wednesday. A case filed on behalf of a 17-year-old girl also killed in the May 2015 Pembroke Pines crash will be tried separately.
The plaintiffs argued Ranger Construction Co. acted recklessly by not closing lanes and positioning extra lights before asking Calero to move a load of concrete barriers after 11 p.m. without a supervisor. The truck was on the I-75 median near the Pines Boulevard exit.
“This particular construction vehicle weighed 80,000 pounds and had no chance of getting up to speed merging into the left high-speed lane from the median in any kind of safe way without a lane closure,” plaintiffs attorney Stuart Ratzan of Ratzan Law Group in Miami said. He worked on the case with colleagues Stuart Weissman and Evan Gilead.
Calero was asked to follow his supervisor, who headed south to another site, Ratzan said. The truck Calero was transporting was facing north, so he made a U-turn to try to head into southbound traffic.
Ranger argued it complied with its contract with the Florida Department of Transportation. Ratzan argued the contract required Ranger not to put construction vehicles on the highway in a way that would disrupt the traffic flow.
The contract prohibited construction vehicles from using a travel lane to accelerate or decelerate, and the contract required lane closures for construction vehicles that were too sluggish to safely merge onto the highway, Ratzan said.
Ranger also argued it was not responsible for Calero's actions since he was a subcontractor. The jury found otherwise, saddling Ranger with the full $20 million in compensatory damages and $25 million in punitive damages. Calero was assigned $5,000 in punitive damages.
Ranger's attorney, Edwin Mortell of Peterson Bernard in Stuart, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Calero's attorney, John Richards of Boyd Richards Parker & Colonnelli in Fort Lauderdale, was also unavailable by deadline.
“This case is a reminder of how powerful and important our third branch of government is for enforcing safety and protecting everyone from harm,” Ratzan said. “Through its verdict, the jury, a cross-section of our community with humility, discipline and order understood that highway construction companies must follow the rules, not just in Broward County, but all over the country.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAutomaker Pleads Guilty and Agrees to $1.6 Billion in Payouts
'I've Seen Terrible Things': Lawyer Predicts Spike in Hazing Suits
Florida Retention Ponds Scrutinized in Lawsuit After Latest Child Drowning
Trending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250