Florida Sales Tax on Commercial Real Property Leases Reduced in January
Florida has given a slight benefit to those who lease commercial property beginning this year.
January 10, 2018 at 11:56 AM
4 minute read
Florida has given a slight benefit to those who lease commercial property beginning in 2018: The state's general 6 percent state level tax will be reduced to 5.8 percent for rental payments received on or after Jan. 1, for occupancy periods beginning on or after this date. However, there is no reduction in the local option surtax that many Florida counties impose.
Property owners should be aware of this reduction in state tax for lease payments related to periods starting this year. In addition, landlords and management companies sending out invoices for rental periods commencing on or after Jan. 1 should revise their invoice software to account for the 0.2 of a percent reduction in the state tax rate.
HOW THE REDUCTION WORKS
Florida is somewhat unique in taxing real property leases. The tax is imposed not only on the base rent, but also on any additional rent, or any consideration required to be paid by the tenant as a condition of occupancy. As a result, the tax is also due on the tenant's share of common area maintenance charges, real property taxes, and most other charges required under the lease.
In addition to this 5.8 percent tax rate, a landlord must also collect the local option surtax imposed by many Florida counties, which generally varies between 0.5 percent and one percent (up to two percent for small counties). There is no reduction in the rate of this local tax. For example, beginning Jan. 1, 2018, lease payments in Miami-Dade County will be taxed at a rate of 6.8 percent, because Miami-Dade County imposes a local surtax at a one percent rate.
Although the new 5.8 percent state level tax rate is effective Jan. 1, 2018, this reduced tax rate is applicable to the lease period to which the rent relates. Accordingly, if a landlord receives rent payments in 2018 for December 2017 occupancy, the 6 percent state level rate would still apply (plus the applicable local surtax). On the other hand, if a tenant pays the rent for January 2018 in December 2017, the 5.8 percent rate would apply.
TAX RATE
It is also important to remember that a lease of residential property is subject to the sales tax on transient rentals unless the rental is under a bona fide written lease for a period of longer than six months.
The rate of this tax on transient rentals will remain at 6 percent (plus local option surtax). Furthermore, a lease of residential real property which is taxable as a transient rental (because it does not satisfy the six-month bona fide written lease requirement) is also subject to local tourist development taxes. The rate on these local tourist development taxes varies from 5 percent to 7 percent for most major counties. There is no reduction in the tax rates of these local level tourist development taxes.
Furthermore, the reduction in the rate does not apply to charges for parking a motor vehicle, for docking a vessel, or for tying down or hangaring an aircraft.
No matter how the new sales tax rate reduction impacts a commercial real estate related business, it is important for those involved to take the time to address any changes that need to be made to accommodate it now—if this has not yet been done.
Marvin A. Kirsner is the administrative shareholder of Greenberg Traurig's Boca Raton office, where his primary areas of practice deal with corporate, transactional and industry specific tax issues. He serves as the co-chair of the firm's state and local tax practice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 2Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
- 36th Circuit Judges Spar Over Constitutionality of Ohio’s Ballot Initiative Procedures
- 4On The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
- 5After Mysterious Parting With Last GC, Photronics Fills Vacancy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250