Last week, an opinion piece discussing the new University System of Georgia Sexual Misconduct Policy posited that the U.S. Department of Education must protect the respondent’s due process rights in any “university-initiated Title IX investigation” of sexual misconduct allegations by “tweak[ing] past policies” to require, for example, that “the appropriate law enforcement and prosecutor’s office investigate and adjudicate the complaint”; and that school disciplinary policies impose the beyond a reasonable doubt standard of proof in a way “consistent with constitutional norms in a criminal case.”
Make no mistake, I oppose all unjustly weighted sexual misconduct grievance procedures. It is for that reason that I object to any suggestion that DOE should, or can, act with unconstitutional caprice to discard statutes such as Title IX and the Clery Act. Indeed, Title IX’s purpose is to ensure that parties are treated equitably in all aspects of their educations. The problem is that schools fail to comply.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
