New Agreement Boosts Hip Implant Settlement to $340 Million
A hip implant device manufacturer that since 2011 has been a defendant in multidistrict product liability litigation on two coasts is augmenting a settlement…
October 04, 2017 at 03:58 PM
3 minute read
A hip implant device manufacturer that since 2011 has been a defendant in multidistrict product liability litigation on two coasts is augmenting a settlement reached last year by an additional $90 million, according to the plaintiffs' co-lead counsel.
Wright Medical Technology will pay about $340 million to resolve would could be as many as 2,000 claims associated with hip implant failures, according to settlement agreements signed last November and on Tuesday.
The settlement will close hundreds of cases filed either as part of an MDL in the Northern District of Georgia or in Los Angeles Superior Court in judicial counsel coordinated proceedings, California's equivalent to a federal MDL.
“We think we have accomplished as favorable a settlement as could be done under the circumstances given Wright's situation financially,” said Michael McGlamry, a partner at Georgia's Pope McGlamry and the plaintiffs' co-lead counsel. McGlamry joined forces with Los Angeles attorney Raymond Boucher in hammering out the settlement agreements under the guidance of a Philadelphia mediator, retired U.S. Magistrate Diane Welsh.
Dana Ash and Matthew Taylor at Duane Morris in Philadelphia, who led a multistate legal team in Wright's defense, could not be reached for comment via phone or email.
The federal cases were assigned to U.S. District Judge William Duffey Jr. in Atlanta, where the first bellwether trial in 2015 resulted in an $11 million jury verdict, including $10 million in punitive damages, for Robyn Christiansen, a 73-year-old Salt Lake City ski instructor who had suffered a catastrophic failure of her Wright-manufactured hip implant.
Duffey eventually slashed $9 million from the jury's punitive damages award, reducing the judgment to $2.1 million. But McGlamry said the Christiansen verdict demonstrated the viability of the product liability claims.
The terms of last year's settlement included payment of about $170,000 to each claimant implanted with the Conserve Cup device and $120,000 to each claimant implanted with either a Dynasty or Lineage replacement hip that had failed.
The flaw that led to the implant failures was a metal-on-metal design that caused metal wear, according to court records in the case. The implant shed metallic debris into the surrounding tissue, leading to a condition known as metallosis, which inflamed and poisoned tissue, dissolved bone that anchored the implant and ultimately caused the implant to fail, court records said.
The new settlement agreement reached this week would include hundreds of cases excluded in the first agreement that, at the time, Wright Technology, the medical device company's new Chinese owners, and Wright's insurance carrier did not have sufficient funds to cover, McGlamry explained.
The new cases include those where hip implants failed after the statute of limitations on suing had expired, cases filed after the original settlement was consummated, and suits by plaintiffs who reconsidered after initially deciding not to accept a settlement offer last year, McGlamry said.
The total $340 million payout, McGlamry added, should resolve every pending claim. Cases where plaintiffs remained determined not to settle will be dismissed and remanded to their states of origin, he said.
Included in the master settlement agreements is a “common benefit assessment,” McGlamry said, that would go to pay lead lawyers who steered the MDL. That assessment is set at 3.5 percent of the total, he said — an estimated $119 million. Individual plaintiffs would also pay legal fees to their personal lawyers from their settlement proceeds, he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAlston & Bird Adds M&A, Private Equity Team From McDermott in New York
4 minute readSmith, Gambrell & Russell Expands to Italy With Cross-Border Transactional Attorneys
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SEC Files Lawsuit Against Elon Musk Over Untimely Twitter Ownership Disclosure
- 2Survey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
- 3FTC Launches Inquiry of Single-Family Rental Home 'Mega Investors,' Issues PBM Report
- 4Womble Bond Dickinson's Wilmington Office Sees New Leadership as Merger Is Completed
- 5Defending Against a $290M Claim and Scoring a $116M Win in Del. Drug Patent Fight
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250