Georgia's Civil Justice System Needs Reform, Letter Writer Argues
Georgia's litigation environment needs reform, lawyer writes.
October 12, 2017 at 11:02 AM
3 minute read
I have read with great interest the reaction of some readers to a recent Harris Poll that is critical of the state's legal climate and trends.
As you reported, Harris conducted a poll this spring of more than 1,300 senior lawyers and executives in companies with annual revenues of at least $100 million. In the results of the survey, Georgia was ranked a disappointing 40th among the fifty states—a decline of 16 places in just five years and an all-time low.
Those who have chosen to comment on this poll in letters have characterized it as “propaganda” or at best inaccurate. Like the iconic and comical figure of the policeman in Hollywood movies, their message appears to be “move along, there is nothing to see here.”
They are wrong. There obviously is a problem. It is a problem that impacts every industry. And, it transcends party lines. If Georgia strives to continue to be among the top states for job creation we must ensure a fair and balanced civil justice system for all citizens, including small businesses, expanding companies and new industries.
In truth, is it really a surprise that the perception of Georgia's legal climate has declined? Georgia has not adopted modern e-discovery rules like the majority of states, and instead relies upon laws drafted in 1966. Much of the remainder of the Georgia Civil Practice Act is of a similar vintage. The practice of forum shopping under Georgia's byzantine venue laws, while a joy to plaintiffs' lawyers, is not charitably viewed by businesses either inside or outside the state. Georgia's Judicial Qualifications Commission, the bulwark of an independent judiciary, has been beset with controversy. The Georgia Court of Appeals appears to be a deeply divided body producing a surprising number of split and conflicting decisions where outcomes seem to be decided by the luck of a panel draw. Inexplicable verdicts have cast the state in a bad light, such as the recent $3.9 million verdict against CSX, which had forbidden a movie company from filming on its tracks, but was found liable for the death of a crew member who trespassed anyway. It is no coincidence that Georgia now possesses the second largest market in the nation for personal injury advertising.
Our sister states are modernizing their laws and focused on fair and balanced reform. Will we eventually decide to do the same? The good news is this is a problem we can solve, if we just decide that we have the will to do it.
In the last session of the General Assembly, Georgia's business judgment rule was revised to fix a decision by the Georgia Supreme Court that left Georgia corporate officers and directors exposed to liability that does not exist in most states. Additionally, Governor Deal has demonstrated a commitment to improving Georgia's civil justice system—as he did with Georgia's criminal justice system—by establishing a Court Reform Council to make Georgia's litigation process more efficient.
Georgia has room for substantial improvement to its current legal environment, and we must aggressively work to reverse the problematic trends before it's too late.
Kade Cullefer
Georgians for Lawsuit Reform
Atlanta
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
$31M Settlement Reached: Litigators Resolve Explosive Lithium-Ion Battery Damages Dispute
8 minute read'Must We Hear the Defense?': Jury Sends Note Indicating Early Decision
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-68
- 2Friday Newspaper
- 3Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 4Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 5NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250