Three Accidents, Two Surgeries and a (Hi-Lo) Verdict
A defense lawyer hails a Waycross jury's award of $143,000 to a motorcycle cop injured when a car rolled off a tow truck who was then involved in two more accidents.
October 12, 2017 at 02:19 PM
9 minute read
Grant Smith (Handout photo)
A Waycross police officer who sued after being struck by a car rolling off of a tow truck, and later injured in two more accidents, was awarded $143,000 by a jury in what the defense attorney said was likely “the most complicated case I'm ever going to try.”
The jury laid all the blame on the wrecker company, declining to apportion any of the blame to the drivers in the subsequent cases or to a third non-party defendant: the surgeon who twice operated on the officer.
The ex-motorcycle cop will actually realize a bit more than the award. A high-low agreement reached during trial bottomed out at $275,000, with a high end of $1 million.
“There were so many legal issues and they were so compacted—it was like a law school exam,” said Dennis, Corry, Smith & Dixon partner Grant Smith, who represented the wrecker company.
Smith said he was gratified with the result of the admitted liability, potentially high exposure case.
The plaintiff, 55-year-old Douglas Smith, was represented by Brent J. Savage of Savannah's Savage, Turner & Pinckney and Alma solo Kenneth Futch, neither of whom responded to requests for comment.
According to attorney Smith and the pretrial order, the case began in late 2012 when the officer responded to an accident to have a vehicle towed. The Pontiac Grand Prix was pulled up on the flatbed wrecker when the J-hooks attaching the cables to the car popped loose, freeing it to roll off.
Douglas Smith had his back turned and, according to the defense, turned around and put his left hand on the car as it “slowly rolled toward him,” traveling about 16 feet before the wrecker's driver was able to run to the driver's side door and stop the car.
Douglas Smith complained of wrist, shoulder and neck pain, and an MRI revealed herniated disks and degenerative spinal in January 2013. Smith underwent a two-level spinal fusion surgery eight months after the accident.
In March 2014, Douglas Smith was directing traffic when a woman in a pickup truck nearly hit him. He twisted to get out of the way and returned to the surgeon who performed the surgery, Raymond Topp, who diagnosed him with a neck and shoulder injury.
Smith returned to work a couple of months later and was on his motorcycle in a crosswalk in June 2014 when a 16-year-old pickup truck driver backed into him, knocking him over.
Smith sustained injuries to his left knee, hip, shoulder and neck, and Topp performed another two-level spinal surgery.
All the fusions left the officer with a “Frankenstein neck” such that he could no longer work at his “dream job” as motorcycle cop, Grant Smith said. He took a medical retirement and received a workers' compensation settlement.
Smith sued Corky's Wrecker Service and the driver in Ware County State Court, although the driver was dismissed before trial.
Douglas Smith demanded Corky's $1 million policy limit, which was declined. During a mediation, defense attorney Smith said he offered to settle for $200,000 “and indicated there was more money available, but they never came off their million-dollar demand.”
A neurosurgeon the plaintiffs team hired to review the records said the second and third accidents did not affect Smith's neck. But during a deposition, he testified that Topp should have operated on two of the vertebrae he fused following the third accident during the first surgery and admitted the second and third accidents aggravated the neck injury, Smith said.
Topp and the drivers in the two other accidents were added to the verdict form as nonparty defendants.
During a four-day trial before Judge Douglas Gibson, Smith said the officer testified the second and third accidents did not caused him many problems.
“I pulled out the lawsuits he filed in those cases and said, 'Mr. Smith, do you agree that these accidents did impact your neck? Isn't it true that you sued [the other drivers] for money damages and settled those cases for money damages?'”
Smith said the officer also changed his story about whether he “braced” on the Pontiac when it went by.
The parties negotiated high-low for $275,000 to $1 million.
The plaintiff claimed medical expenses of $155,000 and lost wages in excess of $500,000, Smith said. During closing arguments, he said Savage asked for $2.6 million.
The jury took about two-and-a-half hours to award $143,000 on Sept. 29, Smith said. Afterward, he said some jurors indicated they wanted to deliver a defense verdict.
“There were credibility issues with the plaintiff,” he said. “I think it was a compromise verdict.”
Grant Smith (Handout photo)
A Waycross police officer who sued after being struck by a car rolling off of a tow truck, and later injured in two more accidents, was awarded $143,000 by a jury in what the defense attorney said was likely “the most complicated case I'm ever going to try.”
The jury laid all the blame on the wrecker company, declining to apportion any of the blame to the drivers in the subsequent cases or to a third non-party defendant: the surgeon who twice operated on the officer.
The ex-motorcycle cop will actually realize a bit more than the award. A high-low agreement reached during trial bottomed out at $275,000, with a high end of $1 million.
“There were so many legal issues and they were so compacted—it was like a law school exam,” said Dennis, Corry, Smith & Dixon partner Grant Smith, who represented the wrecker company.
Smith said he was gratified with the result of the admitted liability, potentially high exposure case.
The plaintiff, 55-year-old Douglas Smith, was represented by Brent J. Savage of Savannah's
According to attorney Smith and the pretrial order, the case began in late 2012 when the officer responded to an accident to have a vehicle towed. The Pontiac Grand Prix was pulled up on the flatbed wrecker when the J-hooks attaching the cables to the car popped loose, freeing it to roll off.
Douglas Smith had his back turned and, according to the defense, turned around and put his left hand on the car as it “slowly rolled toward him,” traveling about 16 feet before the wrecker's driver was able to run to the driver's side door and stop the car.
Douglas Smith complained of wrist, shoulder and neck pain, and an MRI revealed herniated disks and degenerative spinal in January 2013. Smith underwent a two-level spinal fusion surgery eight months after the accident.
In March 2014, Douglas Smith was directing traffic when a woman in a pickup truck nearly hit him. He twisted to get out of the way and returned to the surgeon who performed the surgery, Raymond Topp, who diagnosed him with a neck and shoulder injury.
Smith returned to work a couple of months later and was on his motorcycle in a crosswalk in June 2014 when a 16-year-old pickup truck driver backed into him, knocking him over.
Smith sustained injuries to his left knee, hip, shoulder and neck, and Topp performed another two-level spinal surgery.
All the fusions left the officer with a “Frankenstein neck” such that he could no longer work at his “dream job” as motorcycle cop, Grant Smith said. He took a medical retirement and received a workers' compensation settlement.
Smith sued Corky's Wrecker Service and the driver in Ware County State Court, although the driver was dismissed before trial.
Douglas Smith demanded Corky's $1 million policy limit, which was declined. During a mediation, defense attorney Smith said he offered to settle for $200,000 “and indicated there was more money available, but they never came off their million-dollar demand.”
A neurosurgeon the plaintiffs team hired to review the records said the second and third accidents did not affect Smith's neck. But during a deposition, he testified that Topp should have operated on two of the vertebrae he fused following the third accident during the first surgery and admitted the second and third accidents aggravated the neck injury, Smith said.
Topp and the drivers in the two other accidents were added to the verdict form as nonparty defendants.
During a four-day trial before Judge Douglas Gibson, Smith said the officer testified the second and third accidents did not caused him many problems.
“I pulled out the lawsuits he filed in those cases and said, 'Mr. Smith, do you agree that these accidents did impact your neck? Isn't it true that you sued [the other drivers] for money damages and settled those cases for money damages?'”
Smith said the officer also changed his story about whether he “braced” on the Pontiac when it went by.
The parties negotiated high-low for $275,000 to $1 million.
The plaintiff claimed medical expenses of $155,000 and lost wages in excess of $500,000, Smith said. During closing arguments, he said Savage asked for $2.6 million.
The jury took about two-and-a-half hours to award $143,000 on Sept. 29, Smith said. Afterward, he said some jurors indicated they wanted to deliver a defense verdict.
“There were credibility issues with the plaintiff,” he said. “I think it was a compromise verdict.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArt of the Settlement: Trump Attorney Reveals Strategy in ABC Lawsuit
Court Advisory Committee Inches Forward on Transparency in Litigation Financing
Nashville DA Secretly Recorded Defense Lawyers, Other Office Visitors, Probe Finds
3 minute readJudge Sounds Alarm Over Persistent Circuit Split on 'Favorable Termination' Rule
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250