New U.S. Attorney Asks Judges to Consider More First-Generation Citizens for Juries
On Day Three of his new job as U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, BJay Pak tells the National Association of Women Judges in Atlanta that "It is the role of the judiciary to challenge those assumptions that even ethnic minorities have about themselves."
October 13, 2017 at 10:06 AM
8 minute read
On just his third day on the job as a newly-minted U.S. attorney for Georgia's Northern District, Byung J. “BJay” Pak addressed the National Association of Women Judges in Atlanta Thursday with a plea to give greater consideration to allowing first-generation naturalized U.S. citizens to sit on juries even though English is their second language.
Pak emigrated from South Korea as a child. He was sworn in Tuesday as the state's first Asian-American U.S. attorney.
“I'm not telling you to keep first-generation, naturalized U.S. citizens on a jury,” he said. “But if you look at it from the perspective of educating a prospective juror about the court system, the role of the jury, the role of a judge, we are missing an opportunity if you conveniently use the excuse that their English is not up to par, and you use that for cause to strike that individual.”
“It is the role of the judiciary to challenge those assumptions that even ethnic minorities have about themselves,” he said. “Let's not make it easy on them.”
Pak knows from personal experience, telling the judges of “the juror that got away” when he was a federal prosecutor in Atlanta. Her name was Ms. Kim and she was a rarity—an Asian-American woman on a federal jury panel in Atlanta. He said he knew immediately she was Korean because of her last name.
Pak said he knew that she, too, had made a cultural connection. They nodded at each other as she was ushered in—a gesture that did not go unnoticed by Pak's opposing counsel. He knew he might have to fight to keep her on the jury. But he said he was dismayed when the presiding judge asked if any potential juror had any reason why they couldn't serve, and Kim raised her hand.
She told the judge she didn't know whether she understood English well enough to serve. “Like a cheetah jumping on a gazelle,” the defense asked she be dismissed for cause, Pak recalled.
Pak said he didn't want to let her go so easily, and, if she was dismissed, he wanted it to cost the defense a strike. So he asked and was given permission to question her.
He learned she was married to an American Caucasian, that she and her husband owned a Japanese restaurant and that she was the restaurant's manager and sometimes served as hostess. She had been in the U.S. 28 years. She had capably filled out the juror questionnaire, found her way to the downtown courthouse and answered the judge's and the lawyers' questions.
“Your honor, she's been in the United States longer than me,” Pak said.
Pak said the judge replied, “I can't understand half the things you say, either.” Then he dismissed Kim for cause.
As Kim passed by on her way out, she stopped by the prosecutor's table. “I'm very proud of you,” she said.
In Gwinnett County, which Pak represented during three terms in the Georgia General Assembly, nearly a third of its population speaks another language at home other than English. About 120 foreign languages are spoken by students in the county's schools. Selecting a jury of one's peers is a concept now embedded in America's judicial system, he said.
Reminding his audience that, for decades, women were barred from jury service in much of the nation or could opt out simply because they were women, he suggested that a perceived language barrier that may not exist is at work in preventing more first-generation naturalized citizens from sitting on juries.
“It's troubling,” he said, adding that he suspects it contributes to a growing lack of civic knowledge throughout the population at large.
“We live in a multicultural society,” he said. Jury service, he added, “will certainly pay dividends in helping new citizens learn about their government. Would you strike Ms. Kim off a jury? For cause? Maybe. Maybe not.”
But Pak concluded, “The next time you face another Ms. Kim on a jury panel, you think about it before you make your ruling.”
On just his third day on the job as a newly-minted U.S. attorney for Georgia's Northern District, Byung J. “BJay” Pak addressed the National Association of Women Judges in Atlanta Thursday with a plea to give greater consideration to allowing first-generation naturalized U.S. citizens to sit on juries even though English is their second language.
Pak emigrated from South Korea as a child. He was sworn in Tuesday as the state's first Asian-American U.S. attorney.
“I'm not telling you to keep first-generation, naturalized U.S. citizens on a jury,” he said. “But if you look at it from the perspective of educating a prospective juror about the court system, the role of the jury, the role of a judge, we are missing an opportunity if you conveniently use the excuse that their English is not up to par, and you use that for cause to strike that individual.”
“It is the role of the judiciary to challenge those assumptions that even ethnic minorities have about themselves,” he said. “Let's not make it easy on them.”
Pak knows from personal experience, telling the judges of “the juror that got away” when he was a federal prosecutor in Atlanta. Her name was Ms. Kim and she was a rarity—an Asian-American woman on a federal jury panel in Atlanta. He said he knew immediately she was Korean because of her last name.
Pak said he knew that she, too, had made a cultural connection. They nodded at each other as she was ushered in—a gesture that did not go unnoticed by Pak's opposing counsel. He knew he might have to fight to keep her on the jury. But he said he was dismayed when the presiding judge asked if any potential juror had any reason why they couldn't serve, and Kim raised her hand.
She told the judge she didn't know whether she understood English well enough to serve. “Like a cheetah jumping on a gazelle,” the defense asked she be dismissed for cause, Pak recalled.
Pak said he didn't want to let her go so easily, and, if she was dismissed, he wanted it to cost the defense a strike. So he asked and was given permission to question her.
He learned she was married to an American Caucasian, that she and her husband owned a Japanese restaurant and that she was the restaurant's manager and sometimes served as hostess. She had been in the U.S. 28 years. She had capably filled out the juror questionnaire, found her way to the downtown courthouse and answered the judge's and the lawyers' questions.
“Your honor, she's been in the United States longer than me,” Pak said.
Pak said the judge replied, “I can't understand half the things you say, either.” Then he dismissed Kim for cause.
As Kim passed by on her way out, she stopped by the prosecutor's table. “I'm very proud of you,” she said.
In Gwinnett County, which Pak represented during three terms in the Georgia General Assembly, nearly a third of its population speaks another language at home other than English. About 120 foreign languages are spoken by students in the county's schools. Selecting a jury of one's peers is a concept now embedded in America's judicial system, he said.
Reminding his audience that, for decades, women were barred from jury service in much of the nation or could opt out simply because they were women, he suggested that a perceived language barrier that may not exist is at work in preventing more first-generation naturalized citizens from sitting on juries.
“It's troubling,” he said, adding that he suspects it contributes to a growing lack of civic knowledge throughout the population at large.
“We live in a multicultural society,” he said. Jury service, he added, “will certainly pay dividends in helping new citizens learn about their government. Would you strike Ms. Kim off a jury? For cause? Maybe. Maybe not.”
But Pak concluded, “The next time you face another Ms. Kim on a jury panel, you think about it before you make your ruling.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250