High Court Says High-End Retirement Center Not Exempt from Property Tax
Justice Carol Hunstein (John Disney / ALM )The Georgia Supreme Court has reversed a trial judge and another appellate court over whether an upscale…
October 16, 2017 at 07:29 PM
3 minute read
Justice Carol Hunstein (John Disney / ALM )
The Georgia Supreme Court has reversed a trial judge and another appellate court over whether an upscale assisted living and continuing care development for seniors should qualify as public property in order to avoid taxes.
The high court said no Monday.
Justice Carol Hunstein wrote a unanimous opinion saying the fact that Spring Harbor at Green Island benefited from a $75 million Medical Center Hospital Authority construction bond issue does not automatically make it exempt from property taxes.
“The question of whether a hospital authority's property interest qualifies for ad valorem tax exemption as 'public property' is a separate and distinct question from the issues presented in a bond validation proceeding,” Hunstein wrote. The relevant question, she said, is whether the lease interest is “in furtherance of the legitimate functions of the hospital authority” rather than for “private gain or income.”
The high court reversed the Muscogee County Superior Court and the Georgia Court of Appeals and sent the case back for further proceedings, changing the outcome of a decade-old dispute.
The Hospital Authority sued the Columbus Board of Tax Assessors, the City of Columbus and the tax commissioner for Muscogee County in May 2007, seeking a declaration that its interest in Spring Harbor under a $10, 40-year lease was not subject to ad valorem property taxation. The hospital authority contended its interest was “public property,” that the use and income from the interest furthered its legitimate functions as a hospital authority.
The Hospital Authority won the point in superior court. The Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding that it was bound by the earlier superior court bond validation orders. The Board of Tax Assessors then appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court, which agreed to review the case to determine whether the Court of Appeals was wrong in determining that the bond validation orders conclusively determined that the property is tax exempt.
“The bond validation proceedings did not conclusively establish whether the leasehold interest of the Hospital Authority is 'public property' for tax purposes, and the superior court below should have drawn its own conclusions about taxability,” Hunstein wrote.
The tax assessors' winning legal team includes: Charles Palmer and Kevin Meeks of Troutman Sanders, and Robert Lomax of Columbus.
The hospital authority legal team includes: Jerome Rothschild and Andrew Rothschild of Rothschild & Rothschild in Columbus; J. Randolph Evans and Keshia Lipscomb of Dentons; and Scott Crowley of Columbus.
The case is Columbus Board of Tax Assessors v. Medical Center, No. S17G0091.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Atlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250