'Lawsuit Reform' Is a Solution Seeking a Problem, Attorney Writes
Lawyer responds to a letter from Georgians for Lawsuit Reform.
October 18, 2017 at 07:51 PM
6 minute read
Last week, a letter to the editor from the group calling itself “Georgians for Lawsuit Reform” claimed that there has been a rapid decline in Georgia's legal system and warned of an array of adverse effects it supposedly would have on small businesses. As an attorney and a small business owner myself, I do not agree with these assertions about the nature of my career or my small business. I could give you anecdotal information from my own experiences to support my claims, but I believe that a compilation of facts from my fellow small business owners would be a much better representation of the facts.
Recently, there have been multiple studies from national small business associations exploring the challenges and triumphs of small businesses as viewed by small business owners themselves. For example, the National Federation for Independent Businesses (NFIB) had small business owners rank 75 distinct operation issues that they face in running their businesses. The “Cost and Frequency of Lawsuits/Threatened Lawsuits” came in at No. 68—out of a menu of 75 issues. The same issue was also ranked dead last when respondents were asked to rank 20 “cost” problems they encountered with their business.
Similarly, the National Small Business Association (NSBA) asked its members what challenges their businesses faced. Neither “lawsuits” nor “litigation” were mentioned even once. And in surveys conducted by M&T Bank, Bank of America, TD Bank and Wells Fargo, in which small business owners were asked about their top concerns or what lawmakers could do to help their businesses, lawsuits were not mentioned at all.
The results of these surveys by small business associations do not contain emotionally or politically driven accusations; they contain facts submitted by the very individuals this so-called advocacy group purports to help. I cannot speak for the thousands of other small business owners across this state, but, for myself, I rely on facts to determine how to run my small business. The facts of this matter tell me that the uproar over our legal system is merely a solution seeking a problem, and quite frankly, small business owners have plenty of actual challenges to address without concocting more issues for ourselves and our businesses. If this mouthpiece for the Georgia Chamber of Commerce really wants to help my small business and those of thousands of other Georgians, they should look into the real problems and challenges we face and stop creating new ones just for their political effect.
Jeffrey M. Hood
Calhoun
Last week, a letter to the editor from the group calling itself “Georgians for Lawsuit Reform” claimed that there has been a rapid decline in Georgia's legal system and warned of an array of adverse effects it supposedly would have on small businesses. As an attorney and a small business owner myself, I do not agree with these assertions about the nature of my career or my small business. I could give you anecdotal information from my own experiences to support my claims, but I believe that a compilation of facts from my fellow small business owners would be a much better representation of the facts.
Recently, there have been multiple studies from national small business associations exploring the challenges and triumphs of small businesses as viewed by small business owners themselves. For example, the National Federation for Independent Businesses (NFIB) had small business owners rank 75 distinct operation issues that they face in running their businesses. The “Cost and Frequency of Lawsuits/Threatened Lawsuits” came in at No. 68—out of a menu of 75 issues. The same issue was also ranked dead last when respondents were asked to rank 20 “cost” problems they encountered with their business.
Similarly, the National Small Business Association (NSBA) asked its members what challenges their businesses faced. Neither “lawsuits” nor “litigation” were mentioned even once. And in surveys conducted by M&T Bank,
The results of these surveys by small business associations do not contain emotionally or politically driven accusations; they contain facts submitted by the very individuals this so-called advocacy group purports to help. I cannot speak for the thousands of other small business owners across this state, but, for myself, I rely on facts to determine how to run my small business. The facts of this matter tell me that the uproar over our legal system is merely a solution seeking a problem, and quite frankly, small business owners have plenty of actual challenges to address without concocting more issues for ourselves and our businesses. If this mouthpiece for the Georgia Chamber of Commerce really wants to help my small business and those of thousands of other Georgians, they should look into the real problems and challenges we face and stop creating new ones just for their political effect.
Jeffrey M. Hood
Calhoun
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLetter: Georgia Legal Community Mourns Loss of Joseph Bankoff
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250