$2M Settles Claims for Baker Maimed by Bread Slicer
A Danish emigre whose hand was mauled by a bread-slicing machine with a disabled safety feature settled his personal injury claims for $2 million.
October 26, 2017 at 03:39 PM
4 minute read
A man whose hand was maimed when a bread-slicing machine unexpectedly started as he was cleaning it, reached a $2 million settlement with the company that sold the device.
According to Rafi Law Firm principal Michael Rafi, key to the settlement was evidence that a safety feature that would have kept the machine from starting was disabled for a demonstration prior to sale.
Rafi's client, Danish émigré Jorgen “Jay” Hansen, suffered a near total loss of the use of his right hand. A one-time champion water skier, a sailor who crossed the Atlantic twice, once alone and once with his son, and an accomplished golfer, Hansen is now unable to pursue his profession as a baker.
“The first thing Jay is going to do is go back to Denmark. This case is the main reason he stayed here after the accident,” said Rafi. “I think his goal is to learn how to sail again, and to live on a sailboat.”
According to Rafi and related documents, Hansen and his wife moved to Blue Ridge in 2015 to launch Nordic Rye, a bakery that specializes in Scandinavian rye breads.
Hansen went to Missouri the following year to see a machine that sliced and bagged loaves of bread. The machine was second-hand, and was offered for sale by Bakeryequipment.com, which advertises a variety of new and used equipment and related services.
Hansen took photos and videos of the machine to share with his investors in Denmark and purchased the machine. The machine has six doors that, when open, activate safety sensors to keep it from operating.
As Rafi explained, during the demonstration, Bakeryequipement.com staffers placed metal washers over the sensors so Hansen could watch the machine in action, including the portion that houses two opposing rows of 24 serrated blades that slice the loaves.
Hansen used the machine from February to May 2016 when he was cleaning the blade assemblies. As he reached up to place a spray bottle of cleaning solution on the conveyer, he hit the start button and the machine engaged.
Hansen's right hand was caught between the moving blades, and portions of his thumb, three fingers and hand were mangled and sliced off.
Hansen, then 57, underwent multiple surgeries, but his hand was left severely disfigured, and he continued to suffer intense pain. He developed post-traumatic stress disorder and, in December 2016, suffered a fall when he was unable to grab a porch railing because of his nonfunctional hand.
Rafi said Bakeryequipment.com initially claimed the safety devices was not disabled, but an Aug. 27 demand letter—which included photos of Hansen's injuries—featured pictures he took in Missouri showing washers taped over the sensors.
“We do not see this as a comparative negligence case,” the letter said. “As long as one of machine's doors was open, Jay should have been able to tap, press, hold, or do anything to start button, without causing the machine to turn on. The reason the machine turned on was because Bakeyequipement.com had disabled the main door sensor (and 4 others).”
Bakeryequoipment.com had two insurance policies, and Rafi demanded the $1 million policy limit of each. Rafi said one carrier, Great American Insurance, tendered their $1 million readily. But “it was all-hands-on-deck” to get the second from StarStone, formerly known as Torus.
The settlement was finalized in early October, and the funds have been disbursed, Rafi said.
Bakeryequipment.com was represented by Cruser, Mitchell, Novitz, Sanchez, Gaston & Zimet partner Sean Keenan, who did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Rafi said he expects Hansen to successfully rebuild his life back in Denmark.
“He's someone who sets his mind to something and does it,” said Rafi. “He's also lucky to have an amazing wife who has done everything you can imagine for him during his recovery.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBojangles Restaurant Chain Faces Several Lawsuits Following Data Breach
Stuckey's Leader Using Skills as Georgia Lawyer to Help Revive Iconic Brand
6 minute readHungry for Stability After Execs Exit, Papa John's Gives Legal Chief Big Retention Bonus
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250