AG: Drugmaker Pays State $7M to Settle EpiPen Claims
A pharmaceutical company has paid the state of Georgia $7 million to settle claims it underpaid rebates to the Medicaid program for the popular allergy…
October 27, 2017 at 04:47 PM
2 minute read
![EpiPen auto-injector syringe](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2017/10/EpiPen-Article-201710272017.jpg)
A pharmaceutical company has paid the state of Georgia $7 million to settle claims it underpaid rebates to the Medicaid program for the popular allergy drug EpiPen, Attorney General Chris Carr announced Friday.
Pennsylvania-based Mylan makes the injectable drug that contains epinephrine, a chemical that narrows blood vessels and opens airways in the lungs. It's used to counter severe allergic reactions. A company spokesperson could not be reached for an immediate response.
“Mylan knowingly misrepresented this drug in order to underpay on rebates and make a profit at the expense of our state and others,” Carr said in the news release. “The Georgia Medicaid Fraud Control Unit is prepared to work with nationwide partners to investigate and hold accountable companies that receive payments from taxpayer-funded programs. I am proud of their work and proud that this settlement will bring critical funds back to our state and those who rely on the Medicaid program.”
Mylan agreed to pay $465 million to the United States and the states. The states will share $213,936,000 of the total settlement. As part of the settlement, the state of Georgia received $7,128,069.28 in restitution and other recovery, Carr said.
The settlement resolves allegations that from July 29, 2010 to March 31, 2017, Mylan submitted false statements to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that incorrectly classified EpiPen, Carr said. As a result, Carr said Mylan submitted or caused to be submitted false statements relating to EpiPen for Medicaid rebate purposes, and underpaid its EpiPen rebates.
The settlement with the United States also resolves allegations that Mylan Specialty overcharged certain entities for the drug, Carr said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Judge Rules Georgia Railroad Can Seize Land as Landowners Vow to Fight Judge Rules Georgia Railroad Can Seize Land as Landowners Vow to Fight](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/79/b7/671ef3b3476d87aa130d303428c9/craig-schwall-767x633.jpg)
Judge Rules Georgia Railroad Can Seize Land as Landowners Vow to Fight
![Georgia's Next Judge? Sole Candidate Shortlisted to Rise to Bench Georgia's Next Judge? Sole Candidate Shortlisted to Rise to Bench](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1e/b5/2781124b422ebb7cc232dd321e95/james-jay-crowe-jr-2-767x633.jpg)
![Lawyers' Reenactment Footage Leads to $1.5M Settlement Lawyers' Reenactment Footage Leads to $1.5M Settlement](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/3c/33/bec028d34692a77a1dc2a1f3c8d6/butler-partridge-nicholson-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 2AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
- 3One Court’s Opinion on Successfully Bankruptcy Proofing a Borrower
- 4Making the Case for Workflow Automation
- 5Copyright Infringement by Generative AI Tools Under US and UK Law: Common Threads and Contrasting Approaches
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250