Ga. Supreme Court Throws Out 25-Year-Old Murder Convictions Against Three Soldiers
They were 20 and 21 and just returned from Iraq and Korea when they were arrested for a crime their lawyer said they knew nothing about and were nowhere near. They're now in their mid-40s.
November 02, 2017 at 07:15 PM
4 minute read
Chief Justice P. Harris Hines, Supreme Court of Georgia (Photo: John Disney/ALM)
The Georgia Supreme Court on Thursday reversed the murder convictions of three U.S. servicemen who have been in prison for the past 25 years.
They were 20 and 21 and just returned from Iraq and Korea when they were arrested for a crime their lawyer said they knew nothing about and were nowhere near. They're now in their mid-40s.
Chief Justice P. Harris Hines wrote for a unanimous court, ruling that prosecutors improperly withheld evidence from the defense that likely would have changed the outcome of the trial.
Mark Jason Jones, Kenneth Eric Gardiner and Dominic Brian Lucci, who are white, were stationed at the Fort Stewart Army base near Savannah when they were found guilty in November 1992 of murdering Stanley Jackson, an African-American. Jackson was shot in the street with a high powered assault rifle, possibly an AK-47, and left dead in an intersection. A witness identified two of the men as the shooters, hanging out the windows of their 1992 Chevrolet Cavalier firing rapidly, and said a third man was driving.
All three were convicted of malice murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime and sentenced to life in prison plus five years. In June 1994, the Supreme Court upheld their convictions, according to a summary provided by the court's public information office. The case was heard on a habeas appeal.
After an Open Records Act request in 2010, defense attorneys learned that the police had withheld evidence in the form of a document called the “Yamacraw Report.” That critical police report documented a similar racially-motivated incident on the same night as Jackson's murder but after the three men were already in custody. According to that report, about three hours after the servicemen were arrested, white men with military-style haircuts and carrying semi-automatic weapons drove through the Yamacraw Village public housing project, threatening “to shoot blacks who hung out on street corners.” A citizen reported the incident to a police officer who wrote a report that made its way into the Stanley Jackson police case file. But the report was never disclosed to the defendants' defense counsel and only came to light after the 2010 Open Records Act request.
Also, the defense counsel told the court, the eye witness had first told police he could not identify the shooters and was coerced into testifying differently, according to the summary.
Attorney General Chris Carr and others in his office represented the state. A spokesman for Carr said they were still reviewing the opinion and had not determined whether to seek a new trial.
The defense attorneys are Steven Lee Sparger of Savannah and Peter Camiel of Camiel & Chaney in Seattle.
“We are thrilled,” Camiel said. “These three young soldiers—20 and 21—have been in prison for 25 years for something they had nothing to do with.”
Camiel said all three soldiers were at a wedding rehearsal for one of them in Hinesville—about an hour from Savannah—until 9:30 p.m. the night of the 10 p.m. shooting. They went to Savannah for a bachelor party but didn't arrive until after the crime. They were pulled out of a bar and arrested at 11 p.m. Camiel said the police responded to another similar incident at 1 a.m., but the prosecutors kept it out of the trial.
Two of the men had just returned from Iraq, the other from Korea. The wedding that was to be the next day never happened, Camiel said.
Camiel works with Centurion Ministries, an innocence project headquartered in Princeton, New Jersey. He said, unlike many innocence project cases, this one had no DNA evidence to use to exonerate the clients. No weapon was ever found in the servicemen's car.
While the state could retry the case, Camiel said, “I'd be shocked if they do.” He said the eyewitness—who was watching from his porch across a street in the dark—has recanted his identification testimony.
“What should happen,” said Camiel, “is that these men should go home.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Atlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250