Psychiatric Hospital Facing Suit Again for Releasing Killer
The decision reverses Glynn County State Court Judge Bart Altman's dismissal of the lawsuit against Psychiatric Solutions, owner of Focus by the Sea.
November 08, 2017 at 11:04 AM
7 minute read
Judge Charlie Bethel, Georgia Court of Appeals (Photo: John Disney/ALM)
Nearly nine years after a just-discharged psychiatric patient murdered two people in Florida, the Georgia Court of Appeals has ruled that the surviving children can sue the hospital that sent her home.
“One who takes charge of a third person whom he knows or should know to be likely to cause bodily harm to others if not controlled is under a duty to exercise reasonable care to control the third person to prevent him from doing such harm,” Judge Charlie Bethel wrote.
With the approval of Presiding Judge Christopher McFadden and Judge Elizabeth Branch, Bethel cited a Court of Appeals case, Bradley Center, Inc. v. Wessner, 161 Ga. App. 576 (1982). “This court ruled that, due to the special relationship between the defendant mental health provider and the patient, the provider owed a duty to third parties,” Bethel said.
The decision reverses Glynn County State Court Judge Bart Altman's dismissal of the lawsuit against Psychiatric Solutions, owner of Focus by the Sea. Amy Kern had been an involuntarily committed patient at the private psychiatric hospital on three separate occasions following violent actions, Bethel wrote. She attempted suicide. She chased her boyfriend with an ax. And she threatened to kill him with a tire iron.
“Amy Kern had an extensive mental health history dating back to 1999, and she suffered from a series of psychotic breaks which resulted in violent conduct,” Bethel said.
Bethel said the trial judge was wrong to hold the family to the standards of medical malpractice cases and distinguished this one on the reason for the discharge. It wasn't a medical decision. Rather, the hospital sent Kern home because her insurance stopped paying the bill, Bethel said.
Twelve days later, she killed her grandmother, Donna Kern, and her aunt's boyfriend, William Chapman, Bethel wrote. News reports from the 2009 murders said she drove from the Georgia coast to Florida, shot the aunt's boyfriend with a gun stolen from her father's home and bludgeoned her grandmother with a tire iron.
Beverly Kern sued on behalf of Donna Kern's children. Harriet Curles and Tillie Knight sued on behalf of Chapman's children.
“We appreciate the court's careful consideration of the case-specific facts and the law,” Michael Terry of Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore said in an email. “It is a detailed and thoughtful analysis. We look forward to our clients finally having their day in court.”
Terry represents the families, along with Timothy Rigsbee of Bondurant, Nathan Williams of the Williams Litigation Group in Brunswick, Darren Penn of Penn Law in Atlanta and Jeffrey Harris of Harris Lowry Manton in Savannah.
The hospital's legal team includes Patrick O'Connor, Christopher Ray and Irving William Drought III of Oliver Maner in Savannah. The hospital team could not be reached immediately.
Amy Kern was found not guilty by reason of insanity. Until 2016, she was held in a Florida state mental hospital. A report in the Palm Beach Post said Circuit Judge Joseph Marx ordered her release on the advice of doctors and her transfer to a less-restrictive residential treatment center, reminding her to take her medicine.
The cases are Curles v. Psychiatric Solutions, No. A17A1298, and Kern v. Psychiatric Solutions, No. A17A1299.
Judge Charlie Bethel, Georgia Court of Appeals (Photo: John Disney/ALM)
Nearly nine years after a just-discharged psychiatric patient murdered two people in Florida, the Georgia Court of Appeals has ruled that the surviving children can sue the hospital that sent her home.
“One who takes charge of a third person whom he knows or should know to be likely to cause bodily harm to others if not controlled is under a duty to exercise reasonable care to control the third person to prevent him from doing such harm,” Judge Charlie Bethel wrote.
With the approval of Presiding Judge Christopher McFadden and Judge Elizabeth Branch, Bethel cited a
The decision reverses Glynn County State Court Judge Bart Altman's dismissal of the lawsuit against Psychiatric Solutions, owner of Focus by the Sea. Amy Kern had been an involuntarily committed patient at the private psychiatric hospital on three separate occasions following violent actions, Bethel wrote. She attempted suicide. She chased her boyfriend with an ax. And she threatened to kill him with a tire iron.
“Amy Kern had an extensive mental health history dating back to 1999, and she suffered from a series of psychotic breaks which resulted in violent conduct,” Bethel said.
Bethel said the trial judge was wrong to hold the family to the standards of medical malpractice cases and distinguished this one on the reason for the discharge. It wasn't a medical decision. Rather, the hospital sent Kern home because her insurance stopped paying the bill, Bethel said.
Twelve days later, she killed her grandmother, Donna Kern, and her aunt's boyfriend, William Chapman, Bethel wrote. News reports from the 2009 murders said she drove from the Georgia coast to Florida, shot the aunt's boyfriend with a gun stolen from her father's home and bludgeoned her grandmother with a tire iron.
Beverly Kern sued on behalf of Donna Kern's children. Harriet Curles and Tillie Knight sued on behalf of Chapman's children.
“We appreciate the court's careful consideration of the case-specific facts and the law,” Michael Terry of
Terry represents the families, along with Timothy Rigsbee of Bondurant, Nathan Williams of the Williams Litigation Group in Brunswick, Darren Penn of Penn Law in Atlanta and Jeffrey Harris of Harris Lowry Manton in Savannah.
The hospital's legal team includes Patrick O'Connor, Christopher Ray and Irving William Drought III of
Amy Kern was found not guilty by reason of insanity. Until 2016, she was held in a Florida state mental hospital. A report in the Palm Beach Post said Circuit Judge
The cases are Curles v. Psychiatric Solutions, No. A17A1298, and Kern v. Psychiatric Solutions, No. A17A1299.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute read'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250